Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paizo no longer publishing Dungeon and Dragon
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rom90125" data-source="post: 3467420" data-attributes="member: 17111"><p>A good friend wrote this 'editorial' for my site, and I thought it should be posted here as well.</p><p></p><p>Paizo and Me</p><p></p><p>Two days ago I was happily working on my Tome of Battle campaign setting, </p><p>figuring out how to transition from pen and paper to play by post over the </p><p>summer. I had the next adventure ready, I was getting responses from </p><p>posters, and all seemed well.</p><p></p><p>Yesterday, I learned that Dragon and Dungeon magazines are dead. Wizards of </p><p>the Coast pulled the license that Paizo had been using to publish both </p><p>magazines.</p><p></p><p>Paizo reacted by retooling their website, launching a brand new game product </p><p>to fill the lost Adventure Path series, and offering many options to </p><p>subscribers on how to spend their lost subscription dollars (or to just get </p><p>a check back).</p><p></p><p>Wizards put a news release blurb on their News section. Written by a suit.</p><p></p><p>Now I work for a corporation in my day life. I know how important customers </p><p>are. I can't pay my mortgage unless my customers are happy and I honestly </p><p>want them to be happy with the work I do.</p><p></p><p>So I contrast the responses of Paizo to Wizards. I think about how many </p><p>times I've seen the editors post on the Paizo website and I remember talking </p><p>to several of them at Gen Con. And how rarely I've had contact with R&D at </p><p>Wizards.</p><p></p><p>As a roleplaying customer, I came to the realization that I am not Wizard's </p><p>target market. I DM but only buy miniatures every once in a while.</p><p></p><p>Wizards makes money on miniatures. So much so that in my opinion the </p><p>creation of the miniatures D&D game drove the change to D&D 3.5. Modules put </p><p>out by Wizards now only use monsters that are also minis.</p><p></p><p>I am officially now a dinosaur. I am no longer the market segment Wizards </p><p>wants. At first, that hurt. Now it just pisses me off.</p><p></p><p>However, I don't want to rant here too much or complain. A realization </p><p>dawned on me as I struggled with the loss of Dragon and Dungeon.</p><p></p><p>I am Paizo's target market. They don't just want me to buy their products; </p><p>they would love for me to help write their products (if I'm good enough!). </p><p>They like poster maps as well as battle maps and they use whatever monsters </p><p>drive an adventure, or make them up as needed, not just those that match a </p><p>minis line.</p><p></p><p>My eyes opened further when I realized I've been a Wizard's fanboy for so </p><p>long because of Paizo. I stuck with D&D and switched to 3.5 because I was </p><p>sending queries to Dragon. Even recently, when I've stopped pursuing </p><p>freelance opportunities, I keep buying Wizards stuff because it was in </p><p>Dragon and Dungeon.</p><p></p><p>Now, the strange part. Paizo will now be endorsing third party OGL products </p><p>because they can no longer use Wizards closed content. Do I remain a </p><p>Wizard's fanboy now?</p><p></p><p>Oddly enough, no. I actually enjoy the community part, the friendship part </p><p>of D&D so much that I have discovered I'm actually a Paizo fanboy. I'm a </p><p>proud charter member subscribing to the new Pathfinder product. And I might </p><p>just try my hand at freelancing again.</p><p></p><p>Paizo writes games to make money, I understand that. So does Wizards. The </p><p>difference is that the R&D guys at Wizards aren't the same people making the </p><p>business decisions. The suits don't post on Wizards' website.</p><p></p><p>At Paizo, the managers and the gamers and the designers are all mixed </p><p>together. And they all post online from the editors to the art director to </p><p>the CEO.</p><p></p><p>And I appreciate that. I applaud Paizo's dedication to their customers. And </p><p>I applaud each employee for remaining a fellow gamer. Bravo.</p><p></p><p>I'm proud to be Paizo's target market segment. Or perhaps more accurately, </p><p>one of Paizo's fellow gamers.</p><p></p><p>I excited and ready to tread the path Paizo is laying out with Pathfinder. </p><p>And maybe, if I work really hard, I'll get to help blaze some new trails </p><p>along the way.</p><p></p><p>Charlie, Pathfinder Charter Subscriber</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rom90125, post: 3467420, member: 17111"] A good friend wrote this 'editorial' for my site, and I thought it should be posted here as well. Paizo and Me Two days ago I was happily working on my Tome of Battle campaign setting, figuring out how to transition from pen and paper to play by post over the summer. I had the next adventure ready, I was getting responses from posters, and all seemed well. Yesterday, I learned that Dragon and Dungeon magazines are dead. Wizards of the Coast pulled the license that Paizo had been using to publish both magazines. Paizo reacted by retooling their website, launching a brand new game product to fill the lost Adventure Path series, and offering many options to subscribers on how to spend their lost subscription dollars (or to just get a check back). Wizards put a news release blurb on their News section. Written by a suit. Now I work for a corporation in my day life. I know how important customers are. I can't pay my mortgage unless my customers are happy and I honestly want them to be happy with the work I do. So I contrast the responses of Paizo to Wizards. I think about how many times I've seen the editors post on the Paizo website and I remember talking to several of them at Gen Con. And how rarely I've had contact with R&D at Wizards. As a roleplaying customer, I came to the realization that I am not Wizard's target market. I DM but only buy miniatures every once in a while. Wizards makes money on miniatures. So much so that in my opinion the creation of the miniatures D&D game drove the change to D&D 3.5. Modules put out by Wizards now only use monsters that are also minis. I am officially now a dinosaur. I am no longer the market segment Wizards wants. At first, that hurt. Now it just pisses me off. However, I don't want to rant here too much or complain. A realization dawned on me as I struggled with the loss of Dragon and Dungeon. I am Paizo's target market. They don't just want me to buy their products; they would love for me to help write their products (if I'm good enough!). They like poster maps as well as battle maps and they use whatever monsters drive an adventure, or make them up as needed, not just those that match a minis line. My eyes opened further when I realized I've been a Wizard's fanboy for so long because of Paizo. I stuck with D&D and switched to 3.5 because I was sending queries to Dragon. Even recently, when I've stopped pursuing freelance opportunities, I keep buying Wizards stuff because it was in Dragon and Dungeon. Now, the strange part. Paizo will now be endorsing third party OGL products because they can no longer use Wizards closed content. Do I remain a Wizard's fanboy now? Oddly enough, no. I actually enjoy the community part, the friendship part of D&D so much that I have discovered I'm actually a Paizo fanboy. I'm a proud charter member subscribing to the new Pathfinder product. And I might just try my hand at freelancing again. Paizo writes games to make money, I understand that. So does Wizards. The difference is that the R&D guys at Wizards aren't the same people making the business decisions. The suits don't post on Wizards' website. At Paizo, the managers and the gamers and the designers are all mixed together. And they all post online from the editors to the art director to the CEO. And I appreciate that. I applaud Paizo's dedication to their customers. And I applaud each employee for remaining a fellow gamer. Bravo. I'm proud to be Paizo's target market segment. Or perhaps more accurately, one of Paizo's fellow gamers. I excited and ready to tread the path Paizo is laying out with Pathfinder. And maybe, if I work really hard, I'll get to help blaze some new trails along the way. Charlie, Pathfinder Charter Subscriber [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Paizo no longer publishing Dungeon and Dragon
Top