Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 7818922" data-attributes="member: 22779">[USER=42582]@pemerton[/USER], I'm a little confused by your example of the assailant taking the child, because it seems to be changing.Can you please clarify your example? Because, this is what you wrote:&nbsp; Which I understood to mean that you had no choice in the matter.&nbsp; You defined the person as an assailant - that means he was a credible threat to your life.&nbsp; You did not choose to give your child to this person, he took the child from you.At no point would any court in the world possibly charge you with anything.&nbsp; You are a victim here.&nbsp; Someone kidnapped your child.&nbsp; Had you tried to stop them, you would have died.&nbsp; There isn't a legal system in the world that would possibly even hint at negligent parenting or child endangerment in this situation.THE PALADIN NEVER COOPERATED WITH THE DRAGON.&nbsp; Good grief, how hard is that to understand?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 7818922, member: 22779"] [USER=42582]@pemerton[/USER], I'm a little confused by your example of the assailant taking the child, because it seems to be changing. Can you please clarify your example? Because, this is what you wrote: Which I understood to mean that you had no choice in the matter. You defined the person as an assailant - that means he was a credible threat to your life. You did not choose to give your child to this person, he took the child from you. At no point would any court in the world possibly charge you with anything. You are a victim here. Someone kidnapped your child. Had you tried to stop them, you would have died. There isn't a legal system in the world that would possibly even hint at negligent parenting or child endangerment in this situation. THE PALADIN NEVER COOPERATED WITH THE DRAGON. Good grief, how hard is that to understand? [/QUOTE]

Verification