Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Paramount+ Will Not Proceed with Dungeons & Dragons Live-Action TV Show
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alzrius" data-source="post: 9377012" data-attributes="member: 8461"><p>And I'm just saying that a conclusion, presented without any mention of how it was reached, is something of which we should be skeptical purely as a matter of principle.</p><p></p><p>I'm not making any assertions which require evidence to back up.</p><p></p><p>Which also means that it's fairly pointless to put any faith in the infographic WotC put out.</p><p></p><p>And I'm saying that makes the results of those surveys suspect, and while I'd like to allay those suspicions by looking at the data that went into them, not being able to do that doesn't mean we should just throw our hands in the air and say that we should accept what we're being told.</p><p></p><p>Which, I hope, explains why skepticism should be the default stance.</p><p></p><p>Just because your or I don't see something doesn't mean it isn't there; that requires actually making an inquiry, which itself requires data. Not to mention that overlooks the possibility of an error on their part, such as the one they <em>already admit they made</em>, something which everyone overlooks for some reason.</p><p></p><p>And EN World members are a completely different data set anyway.</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately, it doesn't seem like we'll know, because apparently even suggesting that WotC's lack of explaining how they got their conclusions seems to ruffle quite a few feathers here.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alzrius, post: 9377012, member: 8461"] And I'm just saying that a conclusion, presented without any mention of how it was reached, is something of which we should be skeptical purely as a matter of principle. I'm not making any assertions which require evidence to back up. Which also means that it's fairly pointless to put any faith in the infographic WotC put out. And I'm saying that makes the results of those surveys suspect, and while I'd like to allay those suspicions by looking at the data that went into them, not being able to do that doesn't mean we should just throw our hands in the air and say that we should accept what we're being told. Which, I hope, explains why skepticism should be the default stance. Just because your or I don't see something doesn't mean it isn't there; that requires actually making an inquiry, which itself requires data. Not to mention that overlooks the possibility of an error on their part, such as the one they [i]already admit they made[/i], something which everyone overlooks for some reason. And EN World members are a completely different data set anyway. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem like we'll know, because apparently even suggesting that WotC's lack of explaining how they got their conclusions seems to ruffle quite a few feathers here. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Paramount+ Will Not Proceed with Dungeons & Dragons Live-Action TV Show
Top