Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mamba" data-source="post: 9377109" data-attributes="member: 7034611">I'd say this doesYou can argue that it does not take much of a conspiracy as only WotC is involved, but I consider WotC lying to look better still qualifies as a conspiracy, even if all of the members of that conspiracy work for WotC.then explain to me the difference between 'WotC has a vested interest in lying to us, so we should dismiss their numbers outright unless they release the full data' and a conspiracy - or it and the case you are makingit still is data, it just is not data we should take as fully reliable and you want to dismiss entirelyagreed, but you saying we should not use the data to draw any conclusions or as support for what we said, that is wholesale rejection.If you told me, that since we do not know the methodology, the numbers might be off by 2 or 3 percent by age group, that would be one thing, but you are telling me that the data is so unreliable that we should not consider it at all...</blockquote>