Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Party Balance?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ashrym" data-source="post: 9465787" data-attributes="member: 6750235"><p>So the 2024 PHB has this...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think I might have been taking it for granted my (and other players) experience in how to build a character to fill these roles. I'm not sure how much everyone agrees or disagrees with the premise either and the fact this statement doesn't really give new players information on how these classes fit in with their abilities. It looks to me like it's an appeal to tradition, which I don't think is necessarily bad (I like nostalgia too <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> ) but I think it could have been expanded on a bit more if WotC is putting that premise out for players.</p><p></p><p>I'm also curious what other experienced players might thing of what's needed and where these classes fit into "party balance".</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">cleric looks like "healer and support"</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">fighter looks like "hit things and takes damage"</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">rogue looks like "expertise in skills" -- that one in particular could use more detail</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">wizard looks like "casts offensive spells"</li> </ul><p>I think a class like bard can cover skills instead of a rogue without too many complications, can heal well if selecting the right spells but needs to be cautious due to the armor differences being where they might need to be for healing, and takes a lot of caution trying to select spells to cover for what a wizard can do. The bard is listed for everything but fighter and I think that's misleading because a new player might look at this and think the one class covers more.</p><p></p><p>Meanwhile, I think a druid can cover for a wizard reasonably well within that spell selection; or a DEX based fighter (who can boost skill checks with tactical mind) using (bonus) feats for things like keen mind, observant, and/or skill expert is capable of expertise in investigation, perception, and/or stealth. </p><p></p><p>Student of War adds a bonus skill proficiency; and maneuvers such as ambush, commanding presence, and tactical assessment also give options for bonuses to skill checks a rogue can use.</p><p></p><p>I think I can build a fighter that does well with skill checks. It's just a more complex build on what we're told is a low complexity class. That's also why classifying classes by experts didn't work in the playtest. Skill expertise isn't unique enough and additional skills are easy to get via feat and species and subclass.</p><p></p><p>I haven't played with monks enough to decide they can replace a fighter and don't get that idea on first impression. The initial impression I get is that they don't fit the category the way they are presented. This is more how I see it if WotC continues with the premise to make it easier for new players...</p><p></p><p></p><p>Thoughts?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ashrym, post: 9465787, member: 6750235"] So the 2024 PHB has this... I think I might have been taking it for granted my (and other players) experience in how to build a character to fill these roles. I'm not sure how much everyone agrees or disagrees with the premise either and the fact this statement doesn't really give new players information on how these classes fit in with their abilities. It looks to me like it's an appeal to tradition, which I don't think is necessarily bad (I like nostalgia too :) ) but I think it could have been expanded on a bit more if WotC is putting that premise out for players. I'm also curious what other experienced players might thing of what's needed and where these classes fit into "party balance". [LIST] [*]cleric looks like "healer and support" [*]fighter looks like "hit things and takes damage" [*]rogue looks like "expertise in skills" -- that one in particular could use more detail [*]wizard looks like "casts offensive spells" [/LIST] I think a class like bard can cover skills instead of a rogue without too many complications, can heal well if selecting the right spells but needs to be cautious due to the armor differences being where they might need to be for healing, and takes a lot of caution trying to select spells to cover for what a wizard can do. The bard is listed for everything but fighter and I think that's misleading because a new player might look at this and think the one class covers more. Meanwhile, I think a druid can cover for a wizard reasonably well within that spell selection; or a DEX based fighter (who can boost skill checks with tactical mind) using (bonus) feats for things like keen mind, observant, and/or skill expert is capable of expertise in investigation, perception, and/or stealth. Student of War adds a bonus skill proficiency; and maneuvers such as ambush, commanding presence, and tactical assessment also give options for bonuses to skill checks a rogue can use. I think I can build a fighter that does well with skill checks. It's just a more complex build on what we're told is a low complexity class. That's also why classifying classes by experts didn't work in the playtest. Skill expertise isn't unique enough and additional skills are easy to get via feat and species and subclass. I haven't played with monks enough to decide they can replace a fighter and don't get that idea on first impression. The initial impression I get is that they don't fit the category the way they are presented. This is more how I see it if WotC continues with the premise to make it easier for new players... Thoughts? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Party Balance?
Top