after seeing the pre-release of the Pathfinder Bestiary as a separate book.
Hiho. What pre-release are you speaking off. Is there a preview? Haven't seen one. Please point me in the right direction if there is a download or something. Thanks.
after seeing the pre-release of the Pathfinder Bestiary as a separate book.
Hiho. What pre-release are you speaking off. Is there a preview? Haven't seen one. Please point me in the right direction if there is a download or something. Thanks.
I think that is a good move. First let them bring out improved pre-Epic rules, and then they (and we on their boards) can spend another year coming out with better Epic rules. If they spent time doing Epic rules now, you would probably get something as bad as WotC version.I'm pretty happy with most of the changes put through in Pathfinder (an opinion I've found pretty common at my main forum hangout, Dicefreaks), but I'm really irked by their completely ignoring epic so far.
I happened to hear on a new podcast (the name escapes me at the moment) an interview with Jason Bulmahn in which he said that the Pathfinder book, and yes it is singular, will be in the 600 page range. And from the pdfs they have out, I'm guessing this rulebook will be a combination of the PHB and DMG. I also came to this conclusion after seeing the pre-release of the Pathfinder Bestiary as a separate book.
I am in two Pathfinder games and running one of my own. I like the changes made. The consolidation of skills, class options, and spell changes all make sense while remaining compatible to 3.X rules. My game, which started recently at 1st level, will be strictly Pathfinder until 6th level. Then I will allow 3.X material if any of the players want to use any of it.
In my opinion, I think this (Pathfinder) is what 4E should have been.
In my opinion, I think this (Pathfinder) is what 4E should have been.