Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
pawsplay's dealbreaker list
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Amphimir Míriel" data-source="post: 4214149" data-attributes="member: 55933"><p>Im coming late to this thread, so I'll just throw all of my thoughts in a single post...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not really... As of today, the number of roleplaying gamers in the world has not increased significantly since the days of 2nd edition AD&D.</p><p></p><p>However, it seems that WotC's strategy with 4E is to simplify/clarify the rules, make the game more accessible and fun. </p><p></p><p>This, combined with Hasbro's marketing know-how, could mean that D&D could actually enjoy a second golden age of popularity. If I am reading the signs right, the Beholder in Seattle is just a taste for whats coming, I would expect product placement in TV shows and movies, a few TV commercials (maybe featuring Vin Diesel or other D&D-playing celebrities), a print ad campaign in teen/young adult magazines... etc.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The OGL was not open either, at least not in the sense of the Creative Commons, GFDL or other "truly free" licenses.</p><p></p><p>The whole economic point of both the OGL and the GSL is to <strong>let third parties make supplements for Dungeons and Dragons</strong>. Period.</p><p></p><p>Both licenses allow third parties to do that, and therefore both are useful.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Thank you Hong. As always, we can count on your jokes to provide enlightenment. You are like a Zen master in that.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I practice historical fencing on Sundays, and let me tell you: Fighting with sword-and-dagger (and also sword-and-cape) really adds a whole level of complexity to the whole thing and it mainly helps with defense.</p><p></p><p>The whole point of melee combat (IMHO) is that there is always a rhythm: Strike, parry, counterstrike, riposte, etc. You constantly try to break your opponents rhythm in such a way that you can land a blow without leaving yourself open to attack (since its kinda useless to kill your opponent if you are stabbed in the lung doing so). </p><p></p><p>Using a weapon in your off-hand helps you use one weapon to cover yourself while attacking with the other one. It really doesn't grant you the ability to land more hits. Of course, having a dagger in your off-hand also helps when you are too close to the opponent and already past the threatening range of a sword, but then you are grappling, not in straight melee.</p><p></p><p>And let me tell you, at this point in my training, I am more liable to lose a match when I try to TWF than when I use the sword alone. </p><p></p><p>So I am really ok with people needing feats/powers in order to do the Drizzt-cuisinart thing, although Two Weapon Defense should come for free to those spending the feat (or whatever) to do TWF.</p><p></p><p>(but of course, Precocious Apprentice said this a lot better)</p><p></p><p>And sorry Paws, the boxing analogy does not fly... And as much as it looks cool, wielding two long (and heavy) weapons is not better than wielding a long weapon and a shorter one in your off hand. </p><p></p><p></p><p>And Finally, about the monsters we are not getting in the 1st edition MM... Clark Peterson already promised those in the Tome of Horrors 4e, and besides... Not having good dragons or frost giant stats for a few months is not going to kill my game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Amphimir Míriel, post: 4214149, member: 55933"] Im coming late to this thread, so I'll just throw all of my thoughts in a single post... Not really... As of today, the number of roleplaying gamers in the world has not increased significantly since the days of 2nd edition AD&D. However, it seems that WotC's strategy with 4E is to simplify/clarify the rules, make the game more accessible and fun. This, combined with Hasbro's marketing know-how, could mean that D&D could actually enjoy a second golden age of popularity. If I am reading the signs right, the Beholder in Seattle is just a taste for whats coming, I would expect product placement in TV shows and movies, a few TV commercials (maybe featuring Vin Diesel or other D&D-playing celebrities), a print ad campaign in teen/young adult magazines... etc. The OGL was not open either, at least not in the sense of the Creative Commons, GFDL or other "truly free" licenses. The whole economic point of both the OGL and the GSL is to [B]let third parties make supplements for Dungeons and Dragons[/B]. Period. Both licenses allow third parties to do that, and therefore both are useful. Thank you Hong. As always, we can count on your jokes to provide enlightenment. You are like a Zen master in that. I practice historical fencing on Sundays, and let me tell you: Fighting with sword-and-dagger (and also sword-and-cape) really adds a whole level of complexity to the whole thing and it mainly helps with defense. The whole point of melee combat (IMHO) is that there is always a rhythm: Strike, parry, counterstrike, riposte, etc. You constantly try to break your opponents rhythm in such a way that you can land a blow without leaving yourself open to attack (since its kinda useless to kill your opponent if you are stabbed in the lung doing so). Using a weapon in your off-hand helps you use one weapon to cover yourself while attacking with the other one. It really doesn't grant you the ability to land more hits. Of course, having a dagger in your off-hand also helps when you are too close to the opponent and already past the threatening range of a sword, but then you are grappling, not in straight melee. And let me tell you, at this point in my training, I am more liable to lose a match when I try to TWF than when I use the sword alone. So I am really ok with people needing feats/powers in order to do the Drizzt-cuisinart thing, although Two Weapon Defense should come for free to those spending the feat (or whatever) to do TWF. (but of course, Precocious Apprentice said this a lot better) And sorry Paws, the boxing analogy does not fly... And as much as it looks cool, wielding two long (and heavy) weapons is not better than wielding a long weapon and a shorter one in your off hand. And Finally, about the monsters we are not getting in the 1st edition MM... Clark Peterson already promised those in the Tome of Horrors 4e, and besides... Not having good dragons or frost giant stats for a few months is not going to kill my game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
pawsplay's dealbreaker list
Top