Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
PF2e Bestiary: Let's Read and Review!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dave2008" data-source="post: 7794573" data-attributes="member: 83242"><p>I guess I see it different. What I see is very few poor scores (0-1) actually. Most are average (2-4) and that is what I would expect. Also, I do plan on providing a summary when I am finished, but that is a long way off. I did provide a summary of the A's in post <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/pf2e-bestiary-lets-read-and-review.666690/post-7794336" target="_blank">#11</a></p><p></p><p></p><p>That is not my impression at all. As I noted in my summary of the A's, so far it is average. Which is what I would expect. So thus far, it is meeting my exceptions for a bestiary. I don't know why you think I don't like it? The average score so far is 2.77, so I don't agree with you characterization so far.</p><p></p><p> Perhaps that is the issue. I think "average" or "standard" is acceptable. That is, after all what the words mean. I don't think they are negative terms.</p><p></p><p>That being said, I don't really care to much if other's are interested. I am primarily doing this for myself and am only posting in the off chance others find it interesting or useful. If some else wants to give input I am happy to re-review and adjust my ratings.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That is a good point. I am forced to gloss over things a bit. Ideally, once I complete the initial review I would get a chance to go over and dig in with a bit more detail.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't think I am monster bashing, like I said they are falling in line with expectations. Would I like my expectations to be exceed, sure - but I can't really expect that <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> From my perspective - so far so good.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dave2008, post: 7794573, member: 83242"] I guess I see it different. What I see is very few poor scores (0-1) actually. Most are average (2-4) and that is what I would expect. Also, I do plan on providing a summary when I am finished, but that is a long way off. I did provide a summary of the A's in post [URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/pf2e-bestiary-lets-read-and-review.666690/post-7794336']#11[/URL] That is not my impression at all. As I noted in my summary of the A's, so far it is average. Which is what I would expect. So thus far, it is meeting my exceptions for a bestiary. I don't know why you think I don't like it? The average score so far is 2.77, so I don't agree with you characterization so far. Perhaps that is the issue. I think "average" or "standard" is acceptable. That is, after all what the words mean. I don't think they are negative terms. That being said, I don't really care to much if other's are interested. I am primarily doing this for myself and am only posting in the off chance others find it interesting or useful. If some else wants to give input I am happy to re-review and adjust my ratings. That is a good point. I am forced to gloss over things a bit. Ideally, once I complete the initial review I would get a chance to go over and dig in with a bit more detail. I don't think I am monster bashing, like I said they are falling in line with expectations. Would I like my expectations to be exceed, sure - but I can't really expect that ;) From my perspective - so far so good. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
PF2e Bestiary: Let's Read and Review!
Top