Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
PHB 2024 Is Hilariously Broken. Most OP of All Time?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Snarf Zagyg" data-source="post: 9477814" data-attributes="member: 7023840"><p>I think that the whiteroom theory optimization threads (and the people that do this work) are actually doing a great service. They are acting as free and unpaid QA* for WoTC and the rest of us!</p><p></p><p>*Quality assurance, if that doesn't scan for you.</p><p></p><p>I kid, but only kind of.</p><p></p><p>Look, I get that there is a thrill in seeing how rules can bend and break- some people enjoy it so much that they turn it into a job. Ahem.</p><p></p><p>But when we look at these types of threads, I think it is important to remember the following:</p><p></p><p>1. How realistic is the case? For example, if it can only occur in some crazy MC dip that involves 4 different classes and "turns on" when you're level 12/4/3/1 in them ... well, great to dream about, but you're not going to see it that often. And you need to compare it to what other classes do at level 20.</p><p></p><p>2. Opportunity cost. If the rules "exploit" requires feats or MC dips or whatever, that means you are giving up other things! There is no free lunch.</p><p></p><p>3. Result-oriented readings. 5e is written in "natural language," but also uses "specific terms," which somehow combines the worst of both worlds. You read the rules naturally, but also pay attention to sometimes minute differences in specific word choices ... usually involving various adjectives combined with "attack." <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> Anyway, a lot of the exploits are people straining to read the rules in ways that most tables would reject.</p><p></p><p>4. The "It's not big deal bruh, guys at my high school used to do that all the time," postulate. A lot of the time, a person will announce some exploit with all the subtlety of a youtube video thumbnail showing a shocked woman and a giant red arrow, and when you look at it, it's not an exploit. Just a regular good synergy. It's not punpun- it's a Warlock taking eldritch blast.</p><p></p><p>5. Finally, if there is a true, insane, OP exploit caused by terrible rules? Well ... thank you to the person who found it, because hopefully that will be corrected at some point. But D&D is a social game. You don't win everything, always, ever. If it is really that insane, you can expect that the table will not allow it. Or, if you bully and ruleslawyer your way into allowing it ... well, D&D is a social game. Reap what you sow and all that.</p><p></p><p></p><p><em>ETA- I should add that I think that characters from the 2024 PHB are, on balance, more powerful than the 2014 characters. But they are not "OP." And most of the noticeable bumps went to the martials in general (which is good) or to classes that people previously viewed as somewhat lacking (such as monks). The idea that someone might think that a monk with a dagger is now ... OP ... is admittedly kinda funny. DO YOU THINK YOUR WU-TANG SWORD CAN DEFEAT ME?</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Snarf Zagyg, post: 9477814, member: 7023840"] I think that the whiteroom theory optimization threads (and the people that do this work) are actually doing a great service. They are acting as free and unpaid QA* for WoTC and the rest of us! *Quality assurance, if that doesn't scan for you. I kid, but only kind of. Look, I get that there is a thrill in seeing how rules can bend and break- some people enjoy it so much that they turn it into a job. Ahem. But when we look at these types of threads, I think it is important to remember the following: 1. How realistic is the case? For example, if it can only occur in some crazy MC dip that involves 4 different classes and "turns on" when you're level 12/4/3/1 in them ... well, great to dream about, but you're not going to see it that often. And you need to compare it to what other classes do at level 20. 2. Opportunity cost. If the rules "exploit" requires feats or MC dips or whatever, that means you are giving up other things! There is no free lunch. 3. Result-oriented readings. 5e is written in "natural language," but also uses "specific terms," which somehow combines the worst of both worlds. You read the rules naturally, but also pay attention to sometimes minute differences in specific word choices ... usually involving various adjectives combined with "attack." :) Anyway, a lot of the exploits are people straining to read the rules in ways that most tables would reject. 4. The "It's not big deal bruh, guys at my high school used to do that all the time," postulate. A lot of the time, a person will announce some exploit with all the subtlety of a youtube video thumbnail showing a shocked woman and a giant red arrow, and when you look at it, it's not an exploit. Just a regular good synergy. It's not punpun- it's a Warlock taking eldritch blast. 5. Finally, if there is a true, insane, OP exploit caused by terrible rules? Well ... thank you to the person who found it, because hopefully that will be corrected at some point. But D&D is a social game. You don't win everything, always, ever. If it is really that insane, you can expect that the table will not allow it. Or, if you bully and ruleslawyer your way into allowing it ... well, D&D is a social game. Reap what you sow and all that. [I]ETA- I should add that I think that characters from the 2024 PHB are, on balance, more powerful than the 2014 characters. But they are not "OP." And most of the noticeable bumps went to the martials in general (which is good) or to classes that people previously viewed as somewhat lacking (such as monks). The idea that someone might think that a monk with a dagger is now ... OP ... is admittedly kinda funny. DO YOU THINK YOUR WU-TANG SWORD CAN DEFEAT ME?[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
PHB 2024 Is Hilariously Broken. Most OP of All Time?
Top