Pictoral ST:Nemesis MST3K

[LightPhoenix]

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Nemesis/Pictorial.html

 

[Dirigible]

That's...

pretty painfully unfunny.

 

[reapersaurus]

oh - i forgot to post.
I thought that review was hilarious.

I literally could not watch that movie to the end.
That synopsis was almost exactly as I saw it.

 

[The Mirrorball Man]

Like every single Star Trek movie, Nemesis was a flawed and uninspired, yet somewhat entertaining little space opera movie. I don't understand why it's vilified like that.

 

[Dreeble]

Heya:

Was Nemesis an even-numbered ST movie or an odd-numbered ST movie?

Take care,
Dreeble

 

[LightPhoenix]

The review was pretty unfunny, but that's not particularly why I posted it. It nails every problem with the movie right on the head, and there quite a few of them.

I have no clue as to the odd/even numbering of Nemesis, but for some reason I'm thinking it's even.

 

[buzzard]

Quite a funny review in my view. I think there have been worse ST movies than Nemesis, but by no means was it a good one.

buzzard

 

[myrdden]

It's funny yet sad at the same time. When I watched the movie, my initial reaction was "meh...I saw it" and pretty much left it at that. The pictorial review really nails the problems with this movie (which also probably explains why I haven't picked it up on DVD).

At least it was better (although marginally so) than Insurrection and ST:V!

Myrdden

 

[Aaron L]

Thatr's pretty good, and about what I thought of the movie. I walked out on it when I saw it.

 

[reapersaurus]

How can anyone watch a recent ST movie and not be agog at how bad the action sequences are?

With all the technology that is intrinsic in the show, how can anyone just ignore it and write sequences that would be unbelievable on a weekly TV show?

Seriously - I'd like to hear from anybody who actually still considers themselves a ST fan.
How can you ignore the utterly horrific lapses of logic, science, and common sense?