Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Pineapple Express: Someone Is Wrong on the Internet?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ulorian - Agent of Chaos" data-source="post: 9640610" data-attributes="member: 16668"><p>The concept of ignore lists is fine. If you don't want to listen to someone's nonsense, why should you? The implementation on this site, though, leaves something to be desired in my opinion. If someone decides that someone else's post are just too disturbing/alarming/boring/eyerolling/noisy, they should be free to have that person's posts disappear from the site for them, and to have that person lose the ability to respond to their posts. </p><p></p><p>I don't philosophically agree with doing this; to me, part of life is recognising that not everyone is like you or will agree with you, or you with them. It's better to recognise those differences, and if not embrace and learn from them, at least accept that they exist and move on. Sticking your fingers in your ears and pretending they're not there... that is weird to me.</p><p></p><p>Having said that, I fully support someone's right to ignore someone else. I think it's a poor decision, but that's neither here nor there; the point is, it's your decision.</p><p></p><p>Where the implementation goes off course on this site though, is that the ignorer's decision suddenly impacts the ignoree's ability to enjoy the website. Because of someone else's choice, suddenly, blank spots appear in threads, making it difficult to follow the flow of conversation. </p><p></p><p>Could we disable the reciprocal behaviour of the ignore feature? [USER=1]@Morrus[/USER] [USER=177]@Umbran[/USER] [USER=19675]@Dannyalcatraz[/USER]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ulorian - Agent of Chaos, post: 9640610, member: 16668"] The concept of ignore lists is fine. If you don't want to listen to someone's nonsense, why should you? The implementation on this site, though, leaves something to be desired in my opinion. If someone decides that someone else's post are just too disturbing/alarming/boring/eyerolling/noisy, they should be free to have that person's posts disappear from the site for them, and to have that person lose the ability to respond to their posts. I don't philosophically agree with doing this; to me, part of life is recognising that not everyone is like you or will agree with you, or you with them. It's better to recognise those differences, and if not embrace and learn from them, at least accept that they exist and move on. Sticking your fingers in your ears and pretending they're not there... that is weird to me. Having said that, I fully support someone's right to ignore someone else. I think it's a poor decision, but that's neither here nor there; the point is, it's your decision. Where the implementation goes off course on this site though, is that the ignorer's decision suddenly impacts the ignoree's ability to enjoy the website. Because of someone else's choice, suddenly, blank spots appear in threads, making it difficult to follow the flow of conversation. Could we disable the reciprocal behaviour of the ignore feature? [USER=1]@Morrus[/USER] [USER=177]@Umbran[/USER] [USER=19675]@Dannyalcatraz[/USER] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Pineapple Express: Someone Is Wrong on the Internet?
Top