Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Pineapple Express: Someone Is Wrong on the Internet?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 9805598" data-attributes="member: 23751"><p>And usually someone else has to approve the change. </p><p></p><p>Many years ago my cell phone company changed insurance carriers and I guess they had to inform their customers of what the new coverages would be, because I received a 30-40 page booklet in the mail. I dutifully tossed it onto my desk and forgot about it. Fast forward a few months and I'm sitting at my desk bored out of my mind, not feeling like playing any of my computer games and having nothing else to do. It's a testament to the state of my boredom that I looked at that booklet and thought, "I'm really bored, let me read about my phone insurance coverage."</p><p></p><p>The coverages started out pretty normal. I was covered for <strong>fire</strong>, theft, breakage, loss, etc. Then it went on to tell me that I wasn't covered if I gave it away, or if the FBI confiscated it. A few pages later, though, it got really strange. I was reading down the page and it said, "Your phone is not covered if it is destroyed in a nuclear explosion..." I paused to take that statement in, then kept reading and it continued, "...unless the nuclear explosion starts a fire and the fire destroys the phone." Because of course then I would be covered as it was lost in a fire. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="🤦♂️" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f926-2642.png" title="Man facepalming :man_facepalming:" data-shortname=":man_facepalming:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /></p><p></p><p>All I could do was stare at that sentence and think two things. First, given the proximity of my phone to my person at all times, it wouldn't matter if it were destroyed directly or indirectly by that nuclear blast. They wouldn't need to worry about me filing a claim. Second, not only did someone have to think that up and think it was a good idea to put into the book, but at least one other person had to read and approve it.</p><p></p><p>I really can't think that there would be very many situations where a nuclear explosion happened and the phone was far enough away from the owner for that person to be in any condition to file a claim that phone was lost in a fire instead of directly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Maxperson, post: 9805598, member: 23751"] And usually someone else has to approve the change. Many years ago my cell phone company changed insurance carriers and I guess they had to inform their customers of what the new coverages would be, because I received a 30-40 page booklet in the mail. I dutifully tossed it onto my desk and forgot about it. Fast forward a few months and I'm sitting at my desk bored out of my mind, not feeling like playing any of my computer games and having nothing else to do. It's a testament to the state of my boredom that I looked at that booklet and thought, "I'm really bored, let me read about my phone insurance coverage." The coverages started out pretty normal. I was covered for [B]fire[/B], theft, breakage, loss, etc. Then it went on to tell me that I wasn't covered if I gave it away, or if the FBI confiscated it. A few pages later, though, it got really strange. I was reading down the page and it said, "Your phone is not covered if it is destroyed in a nuclear explosion..." I paused to take that statement in, then kept reading and it continued, "...unless the nuclear explosion starts a fire and the fire destroys the phone." Because of course then I would be covered as it was lost in a fire. 🤦♂️ All I could do was stare at that sentence and think two things. First, given the proximity of my phone to my person at all times, it wouldn't matter if it were destroyed directly or indirectly by that nuclear blast. They wouldn't need to worry about me filing a claim. Second, not only did someone have to think that up and think it was a good idea to put into the book, but at least one other person had to read and approve it. I really can't think that there would be very many situations where a nuclear explosion happened and the phone was far enough away from the owner for that person to be in any condition to file a claim that phone was lost in a fire instead of directly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Pineapple Express: Someone Is Wrong on the Internet?
Top