Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Pineapple Express: Someone Is Wrong on the Internet?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="trappedslider" data-source="post: 9868912" data-attributes="member: 41932"><p>so what everyone is leaving out</p><p></p><p>US copyright law requires <strong>human authorship</strong>. Courts and the Copyright Office have said this for years. Purely autonomous AI output, (raw AI output) with no meaningful human creative control, is not copyrightable.</p><p></p><p>They did <strong>not</strong> ban copyright for AI-assisted works</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>AI-assisted works</strong> <em><strong>can</strong></em> <strong>be copyrighted</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Human selection, editing, composition, iteration, and direction matter</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Copyright can apply to:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">the <strong>prompting strategy</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">the <strong>curation/selection</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">the <strong>post-processing</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">the <strong>overall creative arrangement</strong></li> </ul></li> </ul><p>The Copyright Office itself has said this explicitly.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.copyright.gov/ai/" target="_blank">Copyright and Artificial Intelligence | U.S. Copyright Office</a></p><p><a href="https://www.jonesday.com/en/insights/2025/02/copyrightability-of-ai-outputs-us-copyright-office-analyzes-human-authorship-requirement" target="_blank">U.S. Copyright Office Analyzes Human Authorship Requirement</a></p><p><a href="https://www.sternekessler.com/news-insights/publications/the-u-s-copyright-offices-position-on-the-copyrightability-of-works-made-with-the-assistance-of-generative-ai-part-two/" target="_blank">https://www.sternekessler.com/news-insights/publications/the-u-s-copyright-offices-position-on-the-copyrightability-of-works-made-with-the-assistance-of-generative-ai-part-two/</a></p><p></p><p><strong>1. The USSC didn't rule anything. They declined to hear the case,</strong> which means that lower court cases (and USCO guidance) stand.</p><p></p><p>2. USCO is still accepting copyright registrations for partly AI-made work. You can still copyright <strong>the human elements</strong> <strong>in any work,</strong>That can be as little as a cropping, a recoloring, a minor fix. Good luck entangling those from the rest.</p><p></p><p>3. The case is the Thaler case. For anyone who hasn't followed this, <strong>Thaler is the nut who wants to give copyright to the AI itself.</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="trappedslider, post: 9868912, member: 41932"] so what everyone is leaving out US copyright law requires [B]human authorship[/B]. Courts and the Copyright Office have said this for years. Purely autonomous AI output, (raw AI output) with no meaningful human creative control, is not copyrightable. They did [B]not[/B] ban copyright for AI-assisted works [LIST] [*][B]AI-assisted works[/B] [I][B]can[/B][/I] [B]be copyrighted[/B] [*][B]Human selection, editing, composition, iteration, and direction matter[/B] [*]Copyright can apply to: [LIST] [*]the [B]prompting strategy[/B] [*]the [B]curation/selection[/B] [*]the [B]post-processing[/B] [*]the [B]overall creative arrangement[/B] [/LIST] [/LIST] The Copyright Office itself has said this explicitly. [URL='https://www.copyright.gov/ai/']Copyright and Artificial Intelligence | U.S. Copyright Office[/URL] [URL='https://www.jonesday.com/en/insights/2025/02/copyrightability-of-ai-outputs-us-copyright-office-analyzes-human-authorship-requirement']U.S. Copyright Office Analyzes Human Authorship Requirement[/URL] [URL]https://www.sternekessler.com/news-insights/publications/the-u-s-copyright-offices-position-on-the-copyrightability-of-works-made-with-the-assistance-of-generative-ai-part-two/[/URL] [B]1. The USSC didn't rule anything. They declined to hear the case,[/B] which means that lower court cases (and USCO guidance) stand. 2. USCO is still accepting copyright registrations for partly AI-made work. You can still copyright [B]the human elements[/B] [B]in any work,[/B]That can be as little as a cropping, a recoloring, a minor fix. Good luck entangling those from the rest. 3. The case is the Thaler case. For anyone who hasn't followed this, [B]Thaler is the nut who wants to give copyright to the AI itself.[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Pineapple Express: Someone Is Wrong on the Internet?
Top
