Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ECMO3" data-source="post: 9232450" data-attributes="member: 7030563">It can't do better right now, and I said as much above.&nbsp; I think it will be able to do better in the future though and IMO society should embrace that.&nbsp; Maybe I am wrong, but that is what I believe.I do not see a societal benefit to slowing down, boycotting or otherwise hampering the proliferation of AI art.&nbsp; I think that hurts society.As long as actual artists can compete with machines and make better art then machines at a comparable cost basis they have nothing to worry about.&nbsp; As for society though, the benefit is in having the best art available to the art consumers at the best price, whoever or whatever is making it, and I don't believe that will be living artists for much longer.Also I don't consider art to be &quot;original art&quot; if you are using a computer to make it at all (as most &quot;artists&quot; do today).&nbsp; I think those modern &quot;artists&quot; are doing the same thing you state - using prompts and computer tools built by others to manipulate the image they are making.&nbsp; IMO true, original art ended when &quot;artists&quot; stopped using canvas and paint or pencils and paper .... and I don't think that is a reason to boycott images made on a computer either.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ECMO3, post: 9232450, member: 7030563"] It can't do better right now, and I said as much above. I think it will be able to do better in the future though and IMO society should embrace that. Maybe I am wrong, but that is what I believe. I do not see a societal benefit to slowing down, boycotting or otherwise hampering the proliferation of AI art. I think that hurts society. As long as actual artists can compete with machines and make better art then machines at a comparable cost basis they have nothing to worry about. As for society though, the benefit is in having the best art available to the art consumers at the best price, whoever or whatever is making it, and I don't believe that will be living artists for much longer. Also I don't consider art to be "original art" if you are using a computer to make it at all (as most "artists" do today). I think those modern "artists" are doing the same thing you state - using prompts and computer tools built by others to manipulate the image they are making. IMO true, original art ended when "artists" stopped using canvas and paint or pencils and paper .... and I don't think that is a reason to boycott images made on a computer either. [/QUOTE]

Verification