Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ECMO3" data-source="post: 9233416" data-attributes="member: 7030563">I didn't say we did "need it", I just said we should not restrict it, or stand in its way.  We should let AI bring great art to our society, and if AI creates better art than humans we should embrace it.This is nonsense.  It is the art that matters, the quality of it, and the accessability (i.e. cost) not who, or what created it.I am not against artists, but I am against limiting my access to art to only that which is created by human artists.And a lot of  the people living in my community are working on computers.  One of the teams I supervise is actually developing AI algorithms and tools for analysis (not for art FWIW, but that would be no different philosophically).  Shouldn't I care about them?I agree there is not balance, but I see this opposite of the way you do.  IMO they do not scale because the positives far, far, far outweigh the negatives.  It is not even close IMO and it is social media that is the platform for social justice today.  Computers and social media are the largest advancement in communication in history, eclipsing even the printing press in terms of providing people access to information, art and entertainment.AI and computers can be used for evil, I am not saying they can't.  But AI art is not inherently evil or bad and computers and AI are used for good and the betterment of people far more than it is used for evil.</blockquote>