Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Players Self-Assigning Rolls
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 7300288" data-attributes="member: 16814"><p>"Hi, I'm Bob the Arcanist, and I'd like to look at those runes using my training in arcana and see if I've never seen them before."</p><p></p><p>"Could you rephrase that in a way that wasn't utterly bewildering, Bob? Thanks."</p><p></p><p></p><p>Um, what? </p><p></p><p></p><p>Which choice of phrase? You asked for examples of what an auto-success arcana check and an auto-success medicine check might look like. I provided. Now you're accusing me of requiring the specific form and fit of my examples as 'push this phrase button to win?' Are you trying to be a jerk about it?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Why would I? Seriously, if Bob the Arcanist, who has studied arcana, cannot decipher arcane runes, what was the purpose of his training?</p><p></p><p>Or, is this a weird way of asking how a similar situation might be treated as uncertain instead of autosuccess?</p><p></p><p>If that, and that's me taking an extremely charitable take on your word salad there, if the runes or archaic or of a significantly more powerful effect than what poor Bob could do. However, since Glyph of Warding is a 3rd level spell, and roughly the effect that the altar used in earlier examples would be, I'd give that a free pass to most any group, as at 5th it's in the baliwick.</p><p></p><p>But let's imagine an archway covered in runes that evoke a gate spell for a specific class of demon if activated using the proper ritual and the party being only in the second tier, so not able to cast similar magics. That might go as follows:</p><p></p><p>Bob the Arcanist: 'I rely on my training in arcane writing at Mage College to see if I can decipher the markings on that archway."</p><p></p><p>Me, DM: "Sure thing! You get a vague impression that it might have something to do with teleport magics, but you're uncertain. Bob, make me an Arcana Check, DC 20, to decipher the runes."</p><p></p><p>Bob (success): A 22!</p><p>DM: "Cool! You figure out it's a powerful summoning effect that attracts (specific demon type) from the Abyss. It's powered by a ritual, you figure, but how that works the writings don't say. You'll have to look for that information elsewhere."</p><p></p><p>Bob (failure): A 17. Shucks.</p><p>DM: "Unfortunately, you talents aren't up to fully decrypting the writings."</p><p></p><p>For the disease, a similar event might take place for a rarer or magically induced disease. As you just asked for an example of an autosuccess, I showed one with the assumption that Swamp Pox was a common and easily treatable disease. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, that's not surprising as you likely play with most folks you know of and they share your preferred style. However, when I'm trying to explain my style, which differs from you, perhaps you shouldn't try to evaluate it based on what other people that use your style might say. You might find you learn something, even if you choose to continue on your current pathway.</p><p></p><p>I don't have a master list of diseases or runes either, but I can, very easily, determine if <em>this </em>disease or <em>those </em>runes are common or rare and adjudicate based on that. It's really that simple -- instead of not caring whether this set of runes or that disease is common or rare and letting dice and an arbitrarily selected DC determine if players know what it is, I figure if that piece of information is something I want to be a challenge to determine or if its something that's better off as knowledge the players should have. If the former, it's rare or special and requires a check. If the latter, proficiency in the skill will usually be enough -- although I'll often allow someone not proficient to make a check on common things, or even no check if they tie it into their backgrounds well enough. "My mom died of Swamp Pox, does this look like the same disease?" will get an automatic 'Yes, it does!" from me. That detail is now set for that character, and the game moves forward for it. If the nature of the disease wasn't critical to the rest of the adventure, I'd rewrite the scene on the spot to accommodate that, even.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ovinomancer, post: 7300288, member: 16814"] "Hi, I'm Bob the Arcanist, and I'd like to look at those runes using my training in arcana and see if I've never seen them before." "Could you rephrase that in a way that wasn't utterly bewildering, Bob? Thanks." Um, what? Which choice of phrase? You asked for examples of what an auto-success arcana check and an auto-success medicine check might look like. I provided. Now you're accusing me of requiring the specific form and fit of my examples as 'push this phrase button to win?' Are you trying to be a jerk about it? Why would I? Seriously, if Bob the Arcanist, who has studied arcana, cannot decipher arcane runes, what was the purpose of his training? Or, is this a weird way of asking how a similar situation might be treated as uncertain instead of autosuccess? If that, and that's me taking an extremely charitable take on your word salad there, if the runes or archaic or of a significantly more powerful effect than what poor Bob could do. However, since Glyph of Warding is a 3rd level spell, and roughly the effect that the altar used in earlier examples would be, I'd give that a free pass to most any group, as at 5th it's in the baliwick. But let's imagine an archway covered in runes that evoke a gate spell for a specific class of demon if activated using the proper ritual and the party being only in the second tier, so not able to cast similar magics. That might go as follows: Bob the Arcanist: 'I rely on my training in arcane writing at Mage College to see if I can decipher the markings on that archway." Me, DM: "Sure thing! You get a vague impression that it might have something to do with teleport magics, but you're uncertain. Bob, make me an Arcana Check, DC 20, to decipher the runes." Bob (success): A 22! DM: "Cool! You figure out it's a powerful summoning effect that attracts (specific demon type) from the Abyss. It's powered by a ritual, you figure, but how that works the writings don't say. You'll have to look for that information elsewhere." Bob (failure): A 17. Shucks. DM: "Unfortunately, you talents aren't up to fully decrypting the writings." For the disease, a similar event might take place for a rarer or magically induced disease. As you just asked for an example of an autosuccess, I showed one with the assumption that Swamp Pox was a common and easily treatable disease. Well, that's not surprising as you likely play with most folks you know of and they share your preferred style. However, when I'm trying to explain my style, which differs from you, perhaps you shouldn't try to evaluate it based on what other people that use your style might say. You might find you learn something, even if you choose to continue on your current pathway. I don't have a master list of diseases or runes either, but I can, very easily, determine if [I]this [/I]disease or [I]those [/I]runes are common or rare and adjudicate based on that. It's really that simple -- instead of not caring whether this set of runes or that disease is common or rare and letting dice and an arbitrarily selected DC determine if players know what it is, I figure if that piece of information is something I want to be a challenge to determine or if its something that's better off as knowledge the players should have. If the former, it's rare or special and requires a check. If the latter, proficiency in the skill will usually be enough -- although I'll often allow someone not proficient to make a check on common things, or even no check if they tie it into their backgrounds well enough. "My mom died of Swamp Pox, does this look like the same disease?" will get an automatic 'Yes, it does!" from me. That detail is now set for that character, and the game moves forward for it. If the nature of the disease wasn't critical to the rest of the adventure, I'd rewrite the scene on the spot to accommodate that, even. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Players Self-Assigning Rolls
Top