Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Players Self-Assigning Rolls
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 7300965" data-attributes="member: 6779196"><p>That ”interesting approach that might work in some cases” is the goal-and-approach method of action resolution. When the player states a goal that is impossible to achieve by their stated approach, you don’t roll dice to see what else happens. You re-frame the action in terms of a different goal and approach.</p><p></p><p>Player: I try to jump to the Moon! (Here the DM ascertains a goal - get to the moon - and an approach - by jumping, and makes a judgment call about whether or not the approach can reasonably achieve the goal)</p><p>DM: Yeah, that’s not going to happen (here the DM informs the player of the results of their action)</p><p>Player: Yeah, but I could still get pretty high. Like over that cover maybe. (Here the player re-frames their action. Now the DM ascertains the goal - get over the cover - and the approach - by jumping. The DM might instead have suggested this different framing themselves. For example, “You can’t jump to the Moon. The best you can hope for is to jump over that cover. Want to try?”)</p><p>DM: Ok, go ahead and make a Dexterity (Athletics) check. (Here the DM has determined that the approach has a reasonable chance of succeeding in achieving the goal, a reasonable chance of failing to achieve the goal, and the appropriate method for resolving the outcome.)</p><p></p><p></p><p>I pointed it out for the sake of clarity. But whatever, it’s not an important distinction. I’ll gladly withdraw the objection if it means you’ll address my actual argument.</p><p></p><p></p><p>K. Like I said, if you don’t want to address that point, that’s up to you.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, you answered the question. You said the roll was to see what valuables they found, despite none of them being hidden. That makes sense to me. It’s not the way I would run it, but that’s fine. You do you.</p><p></p><p></p><p>If nothing is hidden, and nothing that is not hidden can be missed, what is the roll being used to determine?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Charlaquin, post: 7300965, member: 6779196"] That ”interesting approach that might work in some cases” is the goal-and-approach method of action resolution. When the player states a goal that is impossible to achieve by their stated approach, you don’t roll dice to see what else happens. You re-frame the action in terms of a different goal and approach. Player: I try to jump to the Moon! (Here the DM ascertains a goal - get to the moon - and an approach - by jumping, and makes a judgment call about whether or not the approach can reasonably achieve the goal) DM: Yeah, that’s not going to happen (here the DM informs the player of the results of their action) Player: Yeah, but I could still get pretty high. Like over that cover maybe. (Here the player re-frames their action. Now the DM ascertains the goal - get over the cover - and the approach - by jumping. The DM might instead have suggested this different framing themselves. For example, “You can’t jump to the Moon. The best you can hope for is to jump over that cover. Want to try?”) DM: Ok, go ahead and make a Dexterity (Athletics) check. (Here the DM has determined that the approach has a reasonable chance of succeeding in achieving the goal, a reasonable chance of failing to achieve the goal, and the appropriate method for resolving the outcome.) I pointed it out for the sake of clarity. But whatever, it’s not an important distinction. I’ll gladly withdraw the objection if it means you’ll address my actual argument. K. Like I said, if you don’t want to address that point, that’s up to you. Well, you answered the question. You said the roll was to see what valuables they found, despite none of them being hidden. That makes sense to me. It’s not the way I would run it, but that’s fine. You do you. If nothing is hidden, and nothing that is not hidden can be missed, what is the roll being used to determine? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Players Self-Assigning Rolls
Top