die_kluge said:
My last few female characters were "pretty" but that is probably due in large part to them being sorcerers, so obviously charisma is my primary score for mechanical reasons.
I've a number of female characters amongst the PCs I created, and most of them are not described as being particularly pretty or ugly.
I've one that was supposed to be reasonnably attractive (a vampire in a WW Vampire game set in the Renaissance), but her attractiveness was more because of her Presence discipline than because of her natural look.
One, in Ars Magica, was described as being cute. But she had sidhe feyblood.
One, in D&D, is described as being really otherwordly beautiful. But she's a sorceress, and an aristocrat, and she's from a supernatural bloodline.
The last of my pretties was not supposed to be pretty. She was supposed to be average, and in fact a bit nerdy. This was in an (aborted, BTW) World of Darkness campaign where we had to create our characters as children, and then they would become one of the supernatural critters of the WoD, as chosen by the GM, during a fast-forward introduction that brings them to adulthood. I made everything I could so that the character would scream "I'm a mage! I'm a mage! I can't be anything else than a mage! Aretes and spheres, here I come!" but the GM choose instead to make her an Eiluned Sidhe. And Sidhe have a +2 bonus (and that would be a +8 bonus for a D&D ability score) on their Appearance score, so she went from "Average" to "Very Pretty".
BTW, same thing for my male characters. They're seldom described as being pretty -- only when it makes sense, for the character's concept, to be pretty.
(And I have even one character that is ugly. A Brujah vampire, covered in scars from his mortal past as a mercenary. But he's dead, now, having been dropped into a pit leading to Hell itself in a Vampire Dark Age campaign that was itself falling into a spiralling abyss of frantic shark-jumping.)