Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Please rate Energy Substitution
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elder-Basilisk" data-source="post: 825950" data-attributes="member: 3146"><p>It's a good feat. I'm undecided on whether ES: Sonic is unbalanced and I think there's a difference between wizard and sorceror characters with regard to this.</p><p></p><p>For a sorceror, ES: Sonic is not a really big deal. Granted, it offers him a way around nearly all energy immunities and resistances but a good selection of fire, cold, and electricity spells (maybe fireball, cone of cold, and Chain Lightning or Chain Lightning, Firebrand, and Icy Burst) along with ES: acid would do that as well. Alternately, a sorceror could focus on fire or cold spells and use the opposite ES feat to gain double damage against most elemental foes. That's probably just as advantageous a route for a sorceror to take.</p><p></p><p>A wizard, on the other hand is a different kettle of fish. Since he's unable to spontaneously apply metamagic feats, he can't use ES: Fire or ES: cold to always have a double damage elemental type available to him. ES is only useful to him in a few situations:</p><p>1. It enables him to take advantage of DC boosting feats (Bloodline of Fire) or abilities (Elemental Savant's elemental focus)</p><p>2. He has advance knowledge of what he will be fighting and can prepare accordingly.</p><p>3. He selects ES: sonic because nearly nothing is immune to it so he can prepare all his spells as sonics on the assumption that, seven times out of ten it will be as good as normal spells, and 2.9 times out of ten it will be better. (For the .1 times out of 10 that he's facing a bard, destrachan, or Formian...oh well, there's still Magic Missile).</p><p></p><p>The last reason is applicable to all wizards and most situations and it's why most wizards who take ES select ES: Sonic rather than one of the others.</p><p></p><p>Is that cheesy or unbalanced? Maybe. It's just as easy to actively defend against (with spells, for instance) as other elements--in fact, it's easier for two reasons (1. There's a very good argument that Silence stops ALL sonic spells and 2. Odds are good that a wizard with sonics has nothing BUT sonics; wizards with fire spells often have some cold and electricity as well). Also, there's very little that sonic damage deals double damage to (unlike ES: Fire or cold for instance). On the other hand, it does bypass passive resistances quite nicely--and passive resistance is far more common than active resistance. I guess that whether the ES: Sonic is unbalanced or not will depend on how much the DM relies upon passive elemental resistance to protect his bad guys.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elder-Basilisk, post: 825950, member: 3146"] It's a good feat. I'm undecided on whether ES: Sonic is unbalanced and I think there's a difference between wizard and sorceror characters with regard to this. For a sorceror, ES: Sonic is not a really big deal. Granted, it offers him a way around nearly all energy immunities and resistances but a good selection of fire, cold, and electricity spells (maybe fireball, cone of cold, and Chain Lightning or Chain Lightning, Firebrand, and Icy Burst) along with ES: acid would do that as well. Alternately, a sorceror could focus on fire or cold spells and use the opposite ES feat to gain double damage against most elemental foes. That's probably just as advantageous a route for a sorceror to take. A wizard, on the other hand is a different kettle of fish. Since he's unable to spontaneously apply metamagic feats, he can't use ES: Fire or ES: cold to always have a double damage elemental type available to him. ES is only useful to him in a few situations: 1. It enables him to take advantage of DC boosting feats (Bloodline of Fire) or abilities (Elemental Savant's elemental focus) 2. He has advance knowledge of what he will be fighting and can prepare accordingly. 3. He selects ES: sonic because nearly nothing is immune to it so he can prepare all his spells as sonics on the assumption that, seven times out of ten it will be as good as normal spells, and 2.9 times out of ten it will be better. (For the .1 times out of 10 that he's facing a bard, destrachan, or Formian...oh well, there's still Magic Missile). The last reason is applicable to all wizards and most situations and it's why most wizards who take ES select ES: Sonic rather than one of the others. Is that cheesy or unbalanced? Maybe. It's just as easy to actively defend against (with spells, for instance) as other elements--in fact, it's easier for two reasons (1. There's a very good argument that Silence stops ALL sonic spells and 2. Odds are good that a wizard with sonics has nothing BUT sonics; wizards with fire spells often have some cold and electricity as well). Also, there's very little that sonic damage deals double damage to (unlike ES: Fire or cold for instance). On the other hand, it does bypass passive resistances quite nicely--and passive resistance is far more common than active resistance. I guess that whether the ES: Sonic is unbalanced or not will depend on how much the DM relies upon passive elemental resistance to protect his bad guys. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Please rate Energy Substitution
Top