Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
PoL & population density
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zurai" data-source="post: 3960185" data-attributes="member: 52324"><p>The <em>average</em> settlement shouldn't be much larger than maybe 1500 people, and there should be no major contact with other settlements. Knowing that there's another town a week's travel in XYZ direction is fine, but there shouldn't be any well-traveled roads between the two. Again, that's an <em>average</em> settlement; there can be "kingdoms" that consist of a decent-sized city connected to several outlying farming villages, but that "kingdom" shouldn't patrol more than maybe 2 days from the "capital".</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, I can see how that can work. My only issue there is that it makes the PCs less "special" if the baseline character is effectively a level 3-4 character. It's almost like the Forgotten Realms, where every other bartender is a retired 9th level fighter with a +3 keen greatsword behind the bar. Not as extreme as FR can get, but it gives me that same "what's a PC then?" kind of feel. I <em>personally</em> would have more trouble enjoying a campaign framed like that, and I'm fairly certain WotC is aiming for Commoner 1 (or Non Heroic 1, in SW Saga Edition terms) as their baseline. However, if a high-powered campaign like that works for you, so be it.</p><p></p><p>I'm not sure how it changes the matter under discussion, however. All you've done is introduced a scaling factor to both sides of the equation; the result is still the same. Even with Joe Schmoe Commoner being a 3rd level fighter, you still have the same ratio of darkness to light. You've increased the brightness of the light, but you've increased the "darkness" of the dark as well. The end result is identical, you just use bigger numbers to get there. Even with your example, there's still a point where you have to have blobs of light to have tenable civilizations.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, that's really beside the point. It doesn't matter that there's some upper end where PoL are forced to become BoL or be extinguished, logically speaking. What matters is that you have fun with the framework, and there's no logic required for that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zurai, post: 3960185, member: 52324"] The [i]average[/i] settlement shouldn't be much larger than maybe 1500 people, and there should be no major contact with other settlements. Knowing that there's another town a week's travel in XYZ direction is fine, but there shouldn't be any well-traveled roads between the two. Again, that's an [i]average[/i] settlement; there can be "kingdoms" that consist of a decent-sized city connected to several outlying farming villages, but that "kingdom" shouldn't patrol more than maybe 2 days from the "capital". Yes, I can see how that can work. My only issue there is that it makes the PCs less "special" if the baseline character is effectively a level 3-4 character. It's almost like the Forgotten Realms, where every other bartender is a retired 9th level fighter with a +3 keen greatsword behind the bar. Not as extreme as FR can get, but it gives me that same "what's a PC then?" kind of feel. I [i]personally[/i] would have more trouble enjoying a campaign framed like that, and I'm fairly certain WotC is aiming for Commoner 1 (or Non Heroic 1, in SW Saga Edition terms) as their baseline. However, if a high-powered campaign like that works for you, so be it. I'm not sure how it changes the matter under discussion, however. All you've done is introduced a scaling factor to both sides of the equation; the result is still the same. Even with Joe Schmoe Commoner being a 3rd level fighter, you still have the same ratio of darkness to light. You've increased the brightness of the light, but you've increased the "darkness" of the dark as well. The end result is identical, you just use bigger numbers to get there. Even with your example, there's still a point where you have to have blobs of light to have tenable civilizations. Anyway, that's really beside the point. It doesn't matter that there's some upper end where PoL are forced to become BoL or be extinguished, logically speaking. What matters is that you have fun with the framework, and there's no logic required for that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
PoL & population density
Top