Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[Poll] Are any of the base classes too weak?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Todd Roybark" data-source="post: 7910684" data-attributes="member: 6920677"><p>Ahh Ruin Explorer, the exemplar of blustery opinion and misplaced certainty that <em>their</em> perspective is <strong>Indubitably, </strong>the only correct opinion. It is a <em>charming</em> reminder of the grand days when a British man’s opinion, in his <em>own</em> mind, ( the <em>only one that matters</em>, really) was worth 12x the ‘truthiness’ value of any facts someone might bother with, ( 20x a frenchman’s). <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="😉" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" title="Winking face :wink:" data-shortname=":wink:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /></p><p></p><p>I write this with affection, I have appreciated your forceful voice in ENworld since the 3x days,</p><p>( Sincerely)</p><p></p><p><em>yet</em>. When I run your statement below through the Universal Translator:</p><p></p><p><strong>Re smiling faces, my own experience is that upbeat and generally positive players tend to be far more willing to select mechanically dubious classes, and far less upset when they can't perform mechanically. </strong></p><p></p><p><em>the statement translates as</em>: “ <strong>I hand wave away the reality of decades of years of fun, players have had with the mechanically dubious monk class, as the result of simple, unwashed, blissfully ignorant, players that do not mind sucking </strong>“.</p><p></p><p><em>It certainly captures the spirit of your words</em> <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="👍" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f44d.png" title="Thumbs up :thumbsup:" data-shortname=":thumbsup:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /></p><p></p><p>The 1e PHB <em>literally</em> describes the monk as, perhaps, the most deadly class in the game at that time. (Pre U/A). Put an 8th level MU, 8th Druid, and 8th level Monk with just fists against a Demon with Magic Resistance and +1 Weapons to hit, and the group is in real trouble!</p><p>The monk can still <em>stun</em> or <em>outright</em> kill on a hit, even if the monk does no damage.</p><p></p><p>A monk with a Staff of Striking, is like chocolate and orange....fairly classic.</p><p></p><p>There are times, in 1e where the monk shines, but to be fair, there are times the monk just gets slaughtered, but hey in 1e that is true for most classes beyond Fighter and Ranger.</p><p></p><p>‘Flurry of Misses’ was the 3e knock of the monk class, but let us face it, the last two attacks of any class were going to most likely miss, especially against high AC opponents. The secret was to maximize the damage on the <em>initial</em> hits. No power attack or Smite feats no dice. <em>This is a system problem</em>, not a Monk problem.</p><p></p><p>You have also never addressed how 5e monks have a magic item problem, that you intimated earlier in the thread.</p><p></p><p>So, respectfully R.E., my consideration of decades of people’s fun, does not “nuke”, my argument. <em>Dismissing</em>, outright, the players of in <em>your</em> opinion: “mechanically dubious”....(read classes that do not meet R.E.’s <em>particuliar</em> standards), only shows that whatever pronouncements you make, however vibrant and flavorful the writing is, still is the mere opinion of one person, with limited universality, if any.</p><p></p><p>Proclaim away, R.E., for you certainly seem short on <em>actual</em> arguments!<img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="🤓" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f913.png" title="Nerd face :nerd:" data-shortname=":nerd:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /> <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="🤺" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f93a.png" title="Person fencing :person_fencing:" data-shortname=":person_fencing:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Todd Roybark, post: 7910684, member: 6920677"] Ahh Ruin Explorer, the exemplar of blustery opinion and misplaced certainty that [I]their[/I] perspective is [B]Indubitably, [/B]the only correct opinion. It is a [I]charming[/I] reminder of the grand days when a British man’s opinion, in his [I]own[/I] mind, ( the [I]only one that matters[/I], really) was worth 12x the ‘truthiness’ value of any facts someone might bother with, ( 20x a frenchman’s). 😉 I write this with affection, I have appreciated your forceful voice in ENworld since the 3x days, ( Sincerely) [I]yet[/I]. When I run your statement below through the Universal Translator: [B]Re smiling faces, my own experience is that upbeat and generally positive players tend to be far more willing to select mechanically dubious classes, and far less upset when they can't perform mechanically. [/B] [I]the statement translates as[/I]: “ [B]I hand wave away the reality of decades of years of fun, players have had with the mechanically dubious monk class, as the result of simple, unwashed, blissfully ignorant, players that do not mind sucking [/B]“. [I]It certainly captures the spirit of your words[/I] 👍 The 1e PHB [I]literally[/I] describes the monk as, perhaps, the most deadly class in the game at that time. (Pre U/A). Put an 8th level MU, 8th Druid, and 8th level Monk with just fists against a Demon with Magic Resistance and +1 Weapons to hit, and the group is in real trouble! The monk can still [I]stun[/I] or [I]outright[/I] kill on a hit, even if the monk does no damage. A monk with a Staff of Striking, is like chocolate and orange....fairly classic. There are times, in 1e where the monk shines, but to be fair, there are times the monk just gets slaughtered, but hey in 1e that is true for most classes beyond Fighter and Ranger. ‘Flurry of Misses’ was the 3e knock of the monk class, but let us face it, the last two attacks of any class were going to most likely miss, especially against high AC opponents. The secret was to maximize the damage on the [I]initial[/I] hits. No power attack or Smite feats no dice. [I]This is a system problem[/I], not a Monk problem. You have also never addressed how 5e monks have a magic item problem, that you intimated earlier in the thread. So, respectfully R.E., my consideration of decades of people’s fun, does not “nuke”, my argument. [I]Dismissing[/I], outright, the players of in [I]your[/I] opinion: “mechanically dubious”....(read classes that do not meet R.E.’s [I]particuliar[/I] standards), only shows that whatever pronouncements you make, however vibrant and flavorful the writing is, still is the mere opinion of one person, with limited universality, if any. Proclaim away, R.E., for you certainly seem short on [I]actual[/I] arguments!🤓 🤺 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[Poll] Are any of the base classes too weak?
Top