Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Poll on the Reaper: is damage on missed melee attack roll believable and balanced?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elf Witch" data-source="post: 5934409" data-attributes="member: 9037"><p>An even bigger sigh I think the game designers should listen to what the play testers tell them if the majority like the feat as it is written then they keep it. If they find the majority of the play testers who respond don't like it then they fix it.</p><p></p><p>I certainly don't think they should base it on a poll on EnWorld because Enworld may be popular but it is not the sum of all gamers. Out of the 25 gamers I know who play regularly and are play testing I am the only one who regularly posts here.</p><p></p><p>There is always a another side to this did you read my criticism with the feat? Or is your mind made up that there is nothing wrong with it?</p><p></p><p>I have brought up several issue I see wrong with the feat but instead of those issues being addressed in a discussion instead I find myself having to defend the fact that I have issue with the feat as written at this moment. </p><p></p><p>Silly me I thought the whole point of a play test was to see if there are issues with the rules and I thought that Enworld was a place where we could discuss these issues like adults. Without personal attacks and being accused of trying to tell people they are playing the game wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elf Witch, post: 5934409, member: 9037"] An even bigger sigh I think the game designers should listen to what the play testers tell them if the majority like the feat as it is written then they keep it. If they find the majority of the play testers who respond don't like it then they fix it. I certainly don't think they should base it on a poll on EnWorld because Enworld may be popular but it is not the sum of all gamers. Out of the 25 gamers I know who play regularly and are play testing I am the only one who regularly posts here. There is always a another side to this did you read my criticism with the feat? Or is your mind made up that there is nothing wrong with it? I have brought up several issue I see wrong with the feat but instead of those issues being addressed in a discussion instead I find myself having to defend the fact that I have issue with the feat as written at this moment. Silly me I thought the whole point of a play test was to see if there are issues with the rules and I thought that Enworld was a place where we could discuss these issues like adults. Without personal attacks and being accused of trying to tell people they are playing the game wrong. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Poll on the Reaper: is damage on missed melee attack roll believable and balanced?
Top