Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="iserith" data-source="post: 7570533" data-attributes="member: 97077">First, I don't think there is One True Way and have stated, several times, people should play in the way they find fun.Second, I'm not forcing anything upon anyone. I've laid out the parameters of an example. I've said what I'd do in that context. I've said what I understand to be the case for what others do in that context based on my past experience with such approaches. I've answered questions put to me honestly and posed questions for others to answer. I've pointed out where these approaches don't work as well as they could to achieve the intended goal and why.Third, my goal here is to hear everyone articulate their thoughts on what they do and why they do it. In part, that's so posters have an opportunity to explain themselves and see where their arguments are not as strong as they could be or where they might discover inconsistencies or flaws. And as I have already stated, I also want others who are reading to have the opportunity to see all sides of this issue and choose for themselves which is the most consistent, logical way to play that most effectively achieves the goals they have for their own tables.I've done all this calmly, rationally, and in a way that isn't intended to cause discord, sometimes going over the same ground several times due to the same misapprehensions or obfuscations arising, often from the same few posters. If you somehow feel persecuted by me for the way you play, brother, that's on how you're reading posts, not on how I'm writing them. And I hope that, considering the topic of discussion, the irony of misattributing thoughts to me that you cannot know and that I do not have is not lost on you.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="iserith, post: 7570533, member: 97077"] First, I don't think there is One True Way and have stated, several times, people should play in the way they find fun. Second, I'm not forcing anything upon anyone. I've laid out the parameters of an example. I've said what I'd do in that context. I've said what I understand to be the case for what others do in that context based on my past experience with such approaches. I've answered questions put to me honestly and posed questions for others to answer. I've pointed out where these approaches don't work as well as they could to achieve the intended goal and why. Third, my goal here is to hear everyone articulate their thoughts on what they do and why they do it. In part, that's so posters have an opportunity to explain themselves and see where their arguments are not as strong as they could be or where they might discover inconsistencies or flaws. And as I have already stated, I also want others who are reading to have the opportunity to see all sides of this issue and choose for themselves which is the most consistent, logical way to play that most effectively achieves the goals they have for their own tables. I've done all this calmly, rationally, and in a way that isn't intended to cause discord, sometimes going over the same ground several times due to the same misapprehensions or obfuscations arising, often from the same few posters. If you somehow feel persecuted by me for the way you play, brother, that's on how you're reading posts, not on how I'm writing them. And I hope that, considering the topic of discussion, the irony of misattributing thoughts to me that you cannot know and that I do not have is not lost on you. [/QUOTE]

Verification