Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Possible houserule for mini-less 4e combat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dragonblade" data-source="post: 5249830" data-attributes="member: 2804"><p>When you run narrative combat in 4e, run it just like you would running an old school 1e/2e narrative combat. Describe what you are doing, use your actions appropriately and the DM adjudicates where the PCs are in relation to the monsters. There are no squares and playing old school narrative style means trusting your DM to be fair and impartial when describing the relative locations of PCs, monsters, and environmental obstacles.</p><p></p><p>While in melee combat, a PC/monster can trade movement for Tactic Points. Whenever a PC/monster trades in their movement for TPs, they don't actually move. Rather gaining TPs represents the PC/monster ducking, weaving, and essentially maneuvering around their foes using footwork, etc. to gain an advantage in combat for themselves or their allies.</p><p></p><p>Every square of movement that a PC/monster moves or forces movement can be traded to grant the party an equivalent number of Tactic Points instead of moving as follows:</p><p></p><p>Move - A PC/monster can trade one Move action for a number of TPs equal to the number of squares they can move. Trading a normal move action for TP's immediately draws an OA from every opponent they are in melee with. (Remember, you must be in melee to earn TP's.)</p><p></p><p>Shift - A PC/monster can trade every square they could normally shift for an equivalent number of TP's. No OAs.</p><p></p><p>Forced movement (pushes, pulls, and slides only) - A PC/monster can trade every square of forced movement they might normally inflict on an opponent into TPs in lieu of actually moving the opponent.</p><p></p><p>Squares of movement traded for TP's can come from any power or action that grants movement. TP's are a shared resource and all TP's generated by the PCs are put into a pool that all PC's draw from. Monsters build up their own pool.</p><p></p><p>10 TP's can be taken from the pool and spent by a single PC/monster to gain combat advantage for one round. Or 15 TP's can be spent to reroll any one missed attack roll or saving throw. Although you must be melee to earn a TP by trading in movement, any PC can spend the points earned. This could represent PCs in combat trying to maneuver around a monster to give their archer ally a better shot.</p><p></p><p>Thoughts? Any tweaks? I recognize that some PCs will try to build up TPs quickly so I didn't want to make the benefits too good, but I thought it would be a nice tradeoff when running a narrative combat where powers that provide movement aren't normally as useful due to the narrative non-grid based nature of it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dragonblade, post: 5249830, member: 2804"] When you run narrative combat in 4e, run it just like you would running an old school 1e/2e narrative combat. Describe what you are doing, use your actions appropriately and the DM adjudicates where the PCs are in relation to the monsters. There are no squares and playing old school narrative style means trusting your DM to be fair and impartial when describing the relative locations of PCs, monsters, and environmental obstacles. While in melee combat, a PC/monster can trade movement for Tactic Points. Whenever a PC/monster trades in their movement for TPs, they don't actually move. Rather gaining TPs represents the PC/monster ducking, weaving, and essentially maneuvering around their foes using footwork, etc. to gain an advantage in combat for themselves or their allies. Every square of movement that a PC/monster moves or forces movement can be traded to grant the party an equivalent number of Tactic Points instead of moving as follows: Move - A PC/monster can trade one Move action for a number of TPs equal to the number of squares they can move. Trading a normal move action for TP's immediately draws an OA from every opponent they are in melee with. (Remember, you must be in melee to earn TP's.) Shift - A PC/monster can trade every square they could normally shift for an equivalent number of TP's. No OAs. Forced movement (pushes, pulls, and slides only) - A PC/monster can trade every square of forced movement they might normally inflict on an opponent into TPs in lieu of actually moving the opponent. Squares of movement traded for TP's can come from any power or action that grants movement. TP's are a shared resource and all TP's generated by the PCs are put into a pool that all PC's draw from. Monsters build up their own pool. 10 TP's can be taken from the pool and spent by a single PC/monster to gain combat advantage for one round. Or 15 TP's can be spent to reroll any one missed attack roll or saving throw. Although you must be melee to earn a TP by trading in movement, any PC can spend the points earned. This could represent PCs in combat trying to maneuver around a monster to give their archer ally a better shot. Thoughts? Any tweaks? I recognize that some PCs will try to build up TPs quickly so I didn't want to make the benefits too good, but I thought it would be a nice tradeoff when running a narrative combat where powers that provide movement aren't normally as useful due to the narrative non-grid based nature of it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Possible houserule for mini-less 4e combat
Top