Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
"Prescription" and RPGing procedures
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 8801383" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>In one of the many threads debating the DMG, hawkeyefan posted this:</p><p></p><p>That post prompted this one. Because it's not really about the DMG, or even D&D per se, I thought it best to start a new thread.</p><p></p><p>It's true that most RPG rulebooks - including D&D ones - have rules for both building PCs, and generating immediate effects of their actions. One example is the one that hawkeyefan points to: rules for building a character who can cast a magical fireball, and for establishing what happens when that spell is cast: X amount of damage is done to those within the explosion, which will kill those with X or fewer hit points. Rolemaster, RuneQuest, GURPS, HERO, Burning Wheel - all have similar rules.</p><p></p><p>In a literal sense these rules are prescriptive: they prescribe how to play the game. But I posit that they are often seen as <em>descriptive</em>, in the sense of describing the fictional world of the game. They are seen as analogous to an encyclopaedia + translation manual, telling us what the fictional world is like and how to represent it in mechanical terms.</p><p></p><p>What that sort of rule <em>doesn't</em> do is tell us anything about <em>how game participants are supposed to go about creating a shared fiction</em>. How are scenes - basic units of fictional happenings in which the PCs participate - established? How is <em>what happens next</em> - not in the sense of <em>what happens when someone is caught in the AoE of a fireball?</em>, but rather <em>what happens to the trajectory of the fiction, given that someone has been killed by (or miraculously survived) a fireball?</em>.</p><p></p><p>There are RPGs that do have rules that deal with those things - Apocalypse World and offshoots, Burning Wheel, MHRP/Cortex+, and notoriously 4e D&D - and these are the game typically diagnosed as "overly" prescriptive.</p><p></p><p>One characteristic of rules that are "prescriptive" in this sense is that they <em>cannot</em> be treated as descriptive of the fictional world of the game. No one can interpret a rule about how to open or close a scene as telling us something, encyclopaedia-like, about the nature of the fiction. (Unless playing Toon or a similarly self-referential RPG - the only other one I can think of is Over the Edge.) Rules like this are manifestly directions on how to play, most often directed at GMs. (But by no means exclusively so.)</p><p></p><p>To me, it seems that the "non-prescriptive" approach to RPGing is an approach in which the rules that are acknowledged and applied are the ones like those for fireball AoE and damage, for sword damage, even for the chance of finding a secret door that the GM has decided "exists" in the fiction; but in which rules that would tell the GM how to make decisions about the fiction are eschewed.</p><p></p><p>This is itself a particular approach to RPGing, probably the mainstream approach since the mid-1980s (so close to the whole duration of the hobby). John Harper diagrams it this way:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]264123[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>(I can't link to the original posting of this diagram, but thank [USER=16586]@Campbell[/USER] for letting me know about it.)</p><p></p><p>The blue stuff in the diagram is things like "I cast a fireball!". The red stuff is conflicts in the fiction, some of which have stuff like "I cast a fireball!" connected to them. The purple "GM fiat" bit is where the GM decides, unbound by particular rules, <em>what happens next</em> in terms of conflict and situation, and the overall trajectory of the fiction. It is the absence of rules - <em>prescriptions</em> - which allows this.</p><p></p><p>Introducing prescriptions to govern these things would significantly change this RPGing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 8801383, member: 42582"] In one of the many threads debating the DMG, hawkeyefan posted this: That post prompted this one. Because it's not really about the DMG, or even D&D per se, I thought it best to start a new thread. It's true that most RPG rulebooks - including D&D ones - have rules for both building PCs, and generating immediate effects of their actions. One example is the one that hawkeyefan points to: rules for building a character who can cast a magical fireball, and for establishing what happens when that spell is cast: X amount of damage is done to those within the explosion, which will kill those with X or fewer hit points. Rolemaster, RuneQuest, GURPS, HERO, Burning Wheel - all have similar rules. In a literal sense these rules are prescriptive: they prescribe how to play the game. But I posit that they are often seen as [I]descriptive[/I], in the sense of describing the fictional world of the game. They are seen as analogous to an encyclopaedia + translation manual, telling us what the fictional world is like and how to represent it in mechanical terms. What that sort of rule [I]doesn't[/I] do is tell us anything about [I]how game participants are supposed to go about creating a shared fiction[/I]. How are scenes - basic units of fictional happenings in which the PCs participate - established? How is [I]what happens next[/I] - not in the sense of [I]what happens when someone is caught in the AoE of a fireball?[/I], but rather [I]what happens to the trajectory of the fiction, given that someone has been killed by (or miraculously survived) a fireball?[/I]. There are RPGs that do have rules that deal with those things - Apocalypse World and offshoots, Burning Wheel, MHRP/Cortex+, and notoriously 4e D&D - and these are the game typically diagnosed as "overly" prescriptive. One characteristic of rules that are "prescriptive" in this sense is that they [I]cannot[/I] be treated as descriptive of the fictional world of the game. No one can interpret a rule about how to open or close a scene as telling us something, encyclopaedia-like, about the nature of the fiction. (Unless playing Toon or a similarly self-referential RPG - the only other one I can think of is Over the Edge.) Rules like this are manifestly directions on how to play, most often directed at GMs. (But by no means exclusively so.) To me, it seems that the "non-prescriptive" approach to RPGing is an approach in which the rules that are acknowledged and applied are the ones like those for fireball AoE and damage, for sword damage, even for the chance of finding a secret door that the GM has decided "exists" in the fiction; but in which rules that would tell the GM how to make decisions about the fiction are eschewed. This is itself a particular approach to RPGing, probably the mainstream approach since the mid-1980s (so close to the whole duration of the hobby). John Harper diagrams it this way: [ATTACH type="full"]264123[/ATTACH] (I can't link to the original posting of this diagram, but thank [USER=16586]@Campbell[/USER] for letting me know about it.) The blue stuff in the diagram is things like "I cast a fireball!". The red stuff is conflicts in the fiction, some of which have stuff like "I cast a fireball!" connected to them. The purple "GM fiat" bit is where the GM decides, unbound by particular rules, [i]what happens next[/i] in terms of conflict and situation, and the overall trajectory of the fiction. It is the absence of rules - [i]prescriptions[/i] - which allows this. Introducing prescriptions to govern these things would significantly change this RPGing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
"Prescription" and RPGing procedures
Top