LazarusLong42
First Post
With a huge thanks to Nathan for pointing out what I'd missed... here are final equations.
In all of these:
R is the desired result.
k is the total number of die types.
n[z] is the number of dice of type z, 1<=z<=k.
d[z] is the number of sides on a die of type z.
N is the total number of dice.
Certain sums used in the k > 2 equation are defined below the equation.
(z is never actually used in the equations, it just makes a good neutral index.)
For two die types (k=2, e.g. 5d4 + 2d8):
For n die types (k<2, e.g. 2d4 + 3d6 + 5d10 + 1d12...):
Remember that this gives only the numerator; the denominator is the iterated product of d[z]^n[z].
My apologies for the large pics, but there's a bunch of information there. If anyone finds discrepancies, let me know... otherwise, I think my work here is done
I think I need to put the k=2 equation in my sig. Iconic Probability equation or some such.
LL
In all of these:
R is the desired result.
k is the total number of die types.
n[z] is the number of dice of type z, 1<=z<=k.
d[z] is the number of sides on a die of type z.
N is the total number of dice.
Certain sums used in the k > 2 equation are defined below the equation.
(z is never actually used in the equations, it just makes a good neutral index.)
For two die types (k=2, e.g. 5d4 + 2d8):

For n die types (k<2, e.g. 2d4 + 3d6 + 5d10 + 1d12...):

Remember that this gives only the numerator; the denominator is the iterated product of d[z]^n[z].
My apologies for the large pics, but there's a bunch of information there. If anyone finds discrepancies, let me know... otherwise, I think my work here is done

I think I need to put the k=2 equation in my sig. Iconic Probability equation or some such.

LL