I don't play over at L4W, but the sheet over there looks just as difficult to review (and presumably to build) as the one here.The L4W wiki sheet is a pleasure to use. The CB character sheet, as a .pdf, is significantly less informative and accessible and easy to review than the L4W wiki sheet. I can't speak for the LEB sheet as I haven't done any reviews here.
And humans cannot make these and many other errors?When I review I check the math too. I don't find it difficult. My problem with the CB is that it frequently has calcultation errors, the summary doesn't help you see how a PC's central features function, and it frequently doesn't allow things that function by RAW or allows things that don't.
I am for it as long as we amend the proposal to allow a CB .pdf to be used instead of the normal template.I am in favor, because the current system really doesn't work.
Who would be the senior reviewers? Any volunteers/nominees?