Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kalidrev" data-source="post: 4996322" data-attributes="member: 84005">I would say that two months, certainly makes someone inactive.&nbsp; One moth: stuff happens, people move, internet gets shut down, and power grids go out... it happens.&nbsp; That's life.&nbsp; 2 months, however, is a pretty sure sign of abandonment.&nbsp; I mean, if the boards are important enough to you that you became a judge, then I think you can find time in a 2 month span to visit a library or other place of internet capability to post SOMETHING saying that you're still alive and well.&nbsp; As for the votes themselves:&nbsp; I think if nothing has been posted to a proposal for an entire month, then the proposal should auto-fail.&nbsp; If it's important enough for you to propose something, it should be important enough for you to at least bump the proposal once a month while the judges make up their minds.&nbsp; So here is my proposal:Votes that a judge makes in a still-open proposal are rescinded if that judge has not posted anywhere in two months.&nbsp; In addition, any proposal that has not had a post in greater than 1 months time (from day X of month Y, to day X of month Z) should auto-fail.&nbsp; These proposals can be re-proposed one month from the date of auto-failure (on day X of the month following the date of auto-failure)./proposalEven if something auto-fails, if it's important enough to the proposer that something NOT be included in our house rules (or changes be made to those rules, since pretty much everything is automatically in after only a month due to the new proposal system), they can propose it again in only a month.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kalidrev, post: 4996322, member: 84005"] I would say that two months, certainly makes someone inactive. One moth: stuff happens, people move, internet gets shut down, and power grids go out... it happens. That's life. 2 months, however, is a pretty sure sign of abandonment. I mean, if the boards are important enough to you that you became a judge, then I think you can find time in a 2 month span to visit a library or other place of internet capability to post SOMETHING saying that you're still alive and well. As for the votes themselves: I think if nothing has been posted to a proposal for an entire month, then the proposal should auto-fail. If it's important enough for you to propose something, it should be important enough for you to at least bump the proposal once a month while the judges make up their minds. So here is my proposal: Votes that a judge makes in a still-open proposal are rescinded if that judge has not posted anywhere in two months. In addition, any proposal that has not had a post in greater than 1 months time (from day X of month Y, to day X of month Z) should auto-fail. These proposals can be re-proposed one month from the date of auto-failure (on day X of the month following the date of auto-failure). /proposal Even if something auto-fails, if it's important enough to the proposer that something NOT be included in our house rules (or changes be made to those rules, since pretty much everything is automatically in after only a month due to the new proposal system), they can propose it again in only a month. [/QUOTE]

Verification