Every major rules debate on this forum should involve someone putting up their avatar or signature or they must back down from their position!Well this definitely is more entertaining than a normal rules debate![]()

Every major rules debate on this forum should involve someone putting up their avatar or signature or they must back down from their position!Well this definitely is more entertaining than a normal rules debate![]()
Every major rules debate on this forum should involve someone putting up their avatar or signature or they must back down from their position!![]()
Thanks folks
In response to Draco pointing out Lightning Rush, I'll just say...
(1) A Defender shouldn't have to wait until Level 7 to be good at their job, and
(2) A psionic defender shouldn't have to use up one of their three at-wills to be good at their job.
I dunno; the other defenders do pretty well right out of the gate. He's below any of them at low level, by a pretty wide margin.1) He's waiting until level 7 to make up for other players who are bad at -their- job.
Naah. Class features are to make a Defender be a good Defender. Blurred Step is a class feature; Lightning Rush is not. His defending competency should not cost him 33% of his entire At Will and Encounter selection.2) Oh contraire. At-wills are for exactly that purpose.
Wardens' class features work to pull enemies back into melee, Mr. Hasselhoff.Battleminds are -equally- as sticky as a Warden. Wardens have the same 'gotta be in melee to be worth a damn' restriction and they have the tools to get the job done just fine. Blurred Step as a free action isn't 'what they need to be fixed.' That goes a little too far.
Wardens' class features work to pull enemies back into melee, Mr. Hasselhoff.Not one of their powers.
-O
When evaluating a class you do not stop evaluating when you read "Level 1 At-Will Disciplines".