zepherus
Explorer
Hello, all -
Since I have not been able to find anything to categorically answer my question in any rulebook ( at least not to my satisfaction ), I will throw this out to get everyone's opinion.
Here's the scenario - PC's are being attacked by a pair of Large warhounds. these WH's have a jump skill of +19. A PC casts a 15 foot stone wall around one of them, to segregate him so they can focus on the other. Ceilings in the room are 30 feet high. The wall completely surrounds him, so in effect he has a normal wall behind him, and a 3-sided wall surrounding him with no extra space beyond his 10 by 10 square. I hope this makes sense.
Now, the WH decides to jump over the wall ( or at least jump up to the top, and then jump off ). I decided this would be a full round action for him to accomplish this.
So, I roll a 17, and state that this is good enough for the WH to accomplish what he set out to do ( for this particular instance, I assigned a DC of 30 ). One of the player's says that that's not good enough, that since the WH is 4-legged, then he only has a vertical reach of 8 feet, and the DC to vertically jump to the top of the wall should be 60 ( 4 times the height being attempted ). My skill check of 36 wouldn't cut it.
After a "heated" discussion concerning the jumping abilities of our 4-legged friends ( especially hounds ), I pulled the "DM" card and said that I was ruling that he made it, and let's move on. Yet, it still bugs me that I can't figure out a way within the rules to state that I was correct ( or that I was wrong ).
So, with all of the rule-mavens out there, what do you say about this predicament? What would it take for a WH that is 8-9 feet tall at the shoulder to be able to get over a 15 foot high wall from standing?
Thanks!
Z-
Since I have not been able to find anything to categorically answer my question in any rulebook ( at least not to my satisfaction ), I will throw this out to get everyone's opinion.
Here's the scenario - PC's are being attacked by a pair of Large warhounds. these WH's have a jump skill of +19. A PC casts a 15 foot stone wall around one of them, to segregate him so they can focus on the other. Ceilings in the room are 30 feet high. The wall completely surrounds him, so in effect he has a normal wall behind him, and a 3-sided wall surrounding him with no extra space beyond his 10 by 10 square. I hope this makes sense.
Now, the WH decides to jump over the wall ( or at least jump up to the top, and then jump off ). I decided this would be a full round action for him to accomplish this.
So, I roll a 17, and state that this is good enough for the WH to accomplish what he set out to do ( for this particular instance, I assigned a DC of 30 ). One of the player's says that that's not good enough, that since the WH is 4-legged, then he only has a vertical reach of 8 feet, and the DC to vertically jump to the top of the wall should be 60 ( 4 times the height being attempted ). My skill check of 36 wouldn't cut it.
After a "heated" discussion concerning the jumping abilities of our 4-legged friends ( especially hounds ), I pulled the "DM" card and said that I was ruling that he made it, and let's move on. Yet, it still bugs me that I can't figure out a way within the rules to state that I was correct ( or that I was wrong ).
So, with all of the rule-mavens out there, what do you say about this predicament? What would it take for a WH that is 8-9 feet tall at the shoulder to be able to get over a 15 foot high wall from standing?
Thanks!
Z-