Joe is a lawyer.I could be reading this wrong, but this comes off as a veiled insult.
And whence the preoccupation to detect/impugn "motifs" to the asking of questions instead of wishing to see them answered?
Joe asked an employee of WotC, whose been helpful and friendly to the ENWorld community, to make legally inadvisable statements in a public forum.
What do you make of this?
(And it's 'motives', not 'motifs'. Impugning a person's motifs is something done in art, music, or literary criticism
