It's a set number per day based on level. He can attempt to exceed that number, but it's risky and carries a cost.sukael said:I may have just missed this somewhere, but how does an Arcanist actually gather mana?
wizofice said:It's a set number per day based on level. He can attempt to exceed that number, but it's risky and carries a cost.
ThirdWizard said:I have another question (for anyone who can answer, doesn't have to be Kaos if anyone else knows).
I have a character who is taking Devious Manipulator (1), but I'm a bit confused on how this works. It says I can make a Bluff against Sense motive to gain a token, but is this a Standard Action? It seems like it is, but I'll make sure others agree.
It just seems odd that your max number of tokens is your level + 10, and that would equate to a, say, 10th level character spending 20 rounds doing nothing but moving around! Since you can spend 5 tokens a round, it seems like they do expect you to build up quite a few tokens, otherwise the restriction wouldn't be as important. But, it still seems to read to me as a Standard Action.
Out of curiosity, why does what material is OGC matter to you? (Unless you're an RPG designer/publisher, in which case, ignore what follows.) As a GM and/or a player, you're not prevented by using anything in RPG books in your games. As a GM/player myself, the openness (or closedness) of a game doesn't matter to me.JBowtie said:What content is designated as OGC in the book? I've found Malhavoc books tend be a lot more closed than, say, Green Ronin (99.44%+ open content, frequently), and don't want to buy any more books where it's "look but don't touch".
Dav said:Out of curiosity, why does what material is OGC matter to you? (Unless you're an RPG designer/publisher, in which case, ignore what follows.) As a GM and/or a player, you're not prevented by using anything in RPG books in your games. As a GM/player myself, the openness (or closedness) of a game doesn't matter to me.
JBowtie said:Well, I do have delusions that I'll actually publish someday. However, as a GM I can't legally reproduce closed content on my campaign wiki - a far more pressing matter. Even if I only included rules by reference, any house rules would likely be considered derived content in some jurisdictions and therefore subject to publisher approval.