Questions for Everyone about Eberron.

What of these applies to you about Eberron?

  • I love Eberron and own at least the main book

    Votes: 157 47.7%
  • I don't like or use Eberron books or materials

    Votes: 75 22.8%
  • I like Eberron, but have not purchased anything for it yet

    Votes: 36 10.9%
  • I would still have bought it if another publisher made it

    Votes: 57 17.3%
  • I DM an Eberron campaign

    Votes: 82 24.9%
  • I use Eberron materials in my own campaigns

    Votes: 108 32.8%
  • I play in an Eberron campaign ran by someone else

    Votes: 66 20.1%
  • I own most or all of the Eberron books

    Votes: 126 38.3%

Hmmm, while I like it, and own it, I would not say that I 'love' it.

If anything the fact that it is from WotC counts against it a bit for me. I find that I like about one out of four WotC books these days, Eberron is one of them. I tend to be a bit leary of their books as a consequence. (Though I will admit that the ones that I do like I tend to like a lot - Tome of Magic and Heroes of Battle are getting woven into my campaigns. PHBII disappeared into the game so seamlessly that it hardly made a ripple. :) ) So far the campaign setting book is the only one that I own. If I were not already running an Iron Kingdoms game I might be interested in running Eberron.

The Auld Grump
 

log in or register to remove this ad

A bit of an overly positive skewed poll toward Eberron. How about a choice like: not really into Eberron but found a few ideas in it kind of cool.
 


I DM an Eberron campaign
I own ECS & PGtE & XPH (basically a 'core' book IMO).

I don't own any of the others but thats only because 2 of my players (a couple) own EVERY eberron source. I just borrow off them or read then prior to the sessions.

As for the whole 'if it exists in D&D then it has a palce in Eberron' - that's nothing more than a indicator to Dms that they can change and accommodate any D&D source into their game if thye so choose.

The only thigns that are DEFINITELY in Eberron (ie presumed when thay made the setting) is the core (PHB DMG & MM), and XPH.

I say that people who haven't tried it should - once you get over the lightning rail and dinosaur ridign halflings, then its really a very good setting.
 

I have purchased Races of Eberron and intend to use the Changlings and Shifters in my own campaign, while I like the Warforged they don't suit my setting.

So I ticked "I like but don't own anything" and "I use element in my own campaign" since as yet I haven't bought any "Eberron" stuff, I probably will at some point however.
 

The Eberron campaign I co-DM'd with my best friend just ended a month ago. When he ran, I played, and when I ran, he played. It was recent enough that I checked both "I DM an Eberron campaign" and "I play in an Eberron campaign."

The only Eberron book I don't have is Secrets of Xen'drik, because it came out after the campaign had ended (or close enough to it that I knew I wouldn't be using it anytime soon). When I run another Eberron campaign, I will buy those books I don't already have.

And yes, I would buy Eberron no matter who it was published by. Why should that matter?
 

I enjoy Eberron and own the Core Rules and a couple of the other books, and would have likely bought it even if some other company had put it out.
 

I was looking for "I like Eberron well enough and have a book" but couldn't find it. Eberron seems like a fun enough setting, but I'd hardly say I loved it.

-The Gneech :cool:
 

I like Eberron, and have just finished purchasing all of the books this past weekend. I am going to start an Eberron campaign soon, too. I was no fan of the setting, at first, but it grew on me. Some aspects still rub me the wrong way, but I can easily play down those aspects if I choose.
 


Remove ads

Top