Ah thanks, I was actually looking for ~Slavic references for Stonefist, because I was just going off of memory. I'd thought I'd read some DRAGON mag article in the 90s about using Slavic flavor for Stonefist Barbarians, but I wasn't sure if I was remembering right. I'll aim to include these in the Hold of Stonefist entry.
Your memory serves you well, young Jedi, though the articles date from the early eighties.
Gygax wrote the following in Dragon Mag #63 (p. 11):
Relating this to the WORLD OF GREYHAWK map, the lands of the Frost, Ice, and Snow Barbarians, as well as the Hold of Stonefist, would produce Scandinavian/Slavic-type barbarian fighters. These characters would employ broad swords and short bows as additional required initial weapons. Horsemanship would be nominal at best, but running would be normal, and in most cases the skill of making and manning rowed boats would exist.
In Dragon Mag #57 (pp. 13-14), he wrote:
While the Hold itself was relatively safe from invasion, the Master, Seuvord Redbeard, and his Atamen and chieftains were faced with a dilemma.
The Rovers of the Barrens were undoubtedly gaining in numbers once again, so no easy raiding prospects existed to the west. Likewise, both southern passes to the rich state of Tenh and the lands of the Fruztii were closed to all but a major effort. A major effort was impossible because of the near-revolt of the eastern (mainly Coltens-descendant) bands under Ataman Dyerg Keda (fighter, 12th level) and supported by over a dozen chieftains and subchiefs. Seuvord Redbeard, being both tough and intelligent, refused to be drawn into a civil war, for then the surrounding enemies of the Hold would surely take the opportunity offered and destroy the remnants of the state. As Seuvord also wished his own line to retain the Mastership of the Hold. as a hereditary right, he called a great council at Purmill, with safe conduct for all who attended.
Many observers were surprised that all of the principal leaders of the Hold took part in the convocation, but those aware of the cleverness of Seuvord knew that he was certainly responsible for the showing. What was put forth at the council by Seuvord Redbeard was that the Hold must adapt to the changes taking place and the new alliances against its people. He asked the assembled leaders to grant him the hereditary title of Rhelt; he asked that Atamen also be made hereditary leaders, and also that the chief men of each area be given the right to elect the warband leaders. The Rite of Battle Fitness was not to be done away with, however. Instead, it would qualify warriors for service in the standing army to be formed immediately, with those of exceptional capabilities to be made leaders, companions of the Rhelt, or even war chiefs whose right it would be to expand the realm through conquest and occupation.
There was considerable dissension, particularly from the direct descendants of Stonefist, but enough of them, as well as of the nomadic chieftains, agreed to Seuvord’s proposal to sway the entire assembly. In CY 578, shortly after Tenh had coronated its new Duke, the Master of the Hold became Rhelt Seuvord I of Stonehold. Several of his cousins took ill from a mysterious flux shortly after the coronation, and about a dozen others were reported fleeing into the Griff Mountains with a small band of loyal followers.
The former Hold of Stonefist is now divided into four Atamanships: Vlekstaad, Purmill, Kelten, and Bastro. Four Great Chieftains were also created: Reindeer, White Bear, Walrus, and Forest (Hraak) People. The word of these Great Chieftains is equal to that of an Ataman. Finally, war chiefs of the west, south, north, and east were appointed to raise bands of fists to keep the land safe until the Rhelt’s own army could be formed.
Although Russian and Ukrainian Cossacks were led by Atamans, I haven't found a real world equivalent for the title of "Rhelt." That one might be entirely fictitious?
As far as the Flan bloodline of many Stoneholders go, Gygax wrote the following in the Guide to the World of Greyhawk (1983, p. 36):
Stonefist, then Vlek Col Vlekzed, founded his chiefdom in approximately 430 CY. Vlek was cast out from the Rovers of the Barrens for banditry and lying, but a small number of warriors and their families followed him as leader [...] Riding unmolested through the lands of his former people, but not caring to test their fighting ability, Vlek moved beyond White Fanged Bay and established a fortified settlement as a permanent camp.
That same source indicates that the leader of the Rovers of the Barrens (one of the few "pure Flan" peoples remaining in the Flanaess, as per p. 10 of the 1983 Guide) also holds the title of "Ataman of the Standards." They "ply lance and javelin, although many also use bows," as well as "lariats to pull enemies down" (p. 33) Further, Gygax adds that "The wardogs are footmen able to run with cavalry and fight, hamstringing enemy mounts and disrupting their formations."
So Gygax's Rovers were a combination of Cossacks and "wild footmen" (wardogs), later revised as a blend of Great Plains Indians and other North American indigenous peoples in David Howery's adventure "Ghost Dance" in Dungeon no. 32 (1991). Here are a few excerpts:
Howery's depiction of the Rovers is a major departure from Gygax's vision, and it definitely muddied the waters where their cultural and linguistic identity are concerned. That in turn has consequences for how we envision the blended Flan/Suloise peoples of Stonehold. Erik Mona and the co-authors of the Living Greyhawk Gazetteer took a middle path with regards to the Rovers, incorporating aspects of both Gygax (Cossacks led by Atamans - but were they "Hamitic, as Gygax describes the Flan elsewhere???) and Howery (Native Americans).
Also, since the Rovers apparently roamed the Barrens before the arrival of the Suloise and Oeridians, does this mean that the "Slavic" elements of their culture (according to Gygax) arose in isolation as opposed to via contact with the northern Suloise barbarians? It's all so confusing. I guess we're back to having to accept the fantasy of it all without seeking out real world comparisons.
As an aside... even though I have no doubt that the work of all Greyhawk authors referred to above was done with a great deal of admiration for the cultures they were inspired by and borrowed from, I can't help but cringe now at the blatant cultural appropriation that they engaged in (especially in the Howery excerpts). Ouch.
Live and learn.