Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Rocker26a" data-source="post: 9405703" data-attributes="member: 7042495">I mean. It was the point I was making. The initial question was about power-gaming multiclass combinations, and the reasons why a given occupant of a world might not immediately rush to achieve the pinnacle of power. Not everyone can, not everyone wants to.It came out of a point about Ranger spellcasting, but that was like 5 messages after I made that first reply. I wasn't constructing a thesis statement about the topic in aggregate.That's how I personally would consider the idea of Rangers not requiring spell components for their spells. It's just how their spellcasting works, similar to Warlocks and their unique spell slots. I wouldn't really think of it as a "technique".It's a minor point, but. What setting? The Forgotten Realms? D&D is a system, you don't have to adhere to what makes sense for the lead setting, or any other specific setting. WOTC are going to of course, but. They're going to do a lot of other stuff for reasons I don't care about too.</blockquote>