Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Horwath" data-source="post: 9456395" data-attributes="member: 6801299">nothing is not an option and it should never be.obviously, rangers needed to get something more than in 2014, and they did. and what they did got, cost something is class resource pool, like EVERY class feature of EVERY class in the game.Every class feature has some numeric value, now we can argue what values is for what feature exactly and does every class get exactly the same amount of points and we would argue about it while humanity discovers warp drive around us.but, ranger did get more of those &quot;points&quot; in 2024 than is 2014. Like most of the classes. Some got more, some got little less more.only problem is here; did rangers got their money worth and are those features the right features to buff up rangers to let's say; paladin like levels? heh!that is the argument here:Is the (over)focusing on Hunters mark worth the class resources and is it a good idea by itself to &quot;straitjacket&quot; whole class to a single 1st level spell?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Horwath, post: 9456395, member: 6801299"] nothing is not an option and it should never be. obviously, rangers needed to get something more than in 2014, and they did. and what they did got, cost something is class resource pool, like EVERY class feature of EVERY class in the game. Every class feature has some numeric value, now we can argue what values is for what feature exactly and does every class get exactly the same amount of points and we would argue about it while humanity discovers warp drive around us. but, ranger did get more of those "points" in 2024 than is 2014. Like most of the classes. Some got more, some got little less more. only problem is here; did rangers got their money worth and are those features the right features to buff up rangers to let's say; paladin like levels? heh! that is the argument here: Is the (over)focusing on Hunters mark worth the class resources and is it a good idea by itself to "straitjacket" whole class to a single 1st level spell? [/QUOTE]

Verification