Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="OB1" data-source="post: 9459261" data-attributes="member: 6796241">While so far my '24 Ranger is happy with the class, I am considering one change to HM.Instead of a Bonus Action, I would allow HM to be applied when the Ranger hit's with an attack (both initial casting and moving it once the original creature is killed.&nbsp; Spell slot is expended but no additional action neccessary.I got the idea because in last Friday's session, she accidentally both cast HM and used a bonus action attack in the same round.&nbsp; We caught it the next round (and took her BA for that round as a result) but really, it didn't seem like overkill and I realized after that applying the mark on an attack that hits could really help the action economy for the Ranger.&nbsp; I would still allow it to be applied as a bonus action if the Ranger doesn't want to do damage with it (for tracking purposes or the like)Any thoughts on if this is too good?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="OB1, post: 9459261, member: 6796241"] While so far my '24 Ranger is happy with the class, I am considering one change to HM. Instead of a Bonus Action, I would allow HM to be applied when the Ranger hit's with an attack (both initial casting and moving it once the original creature is killed. Spell slot is expended but no additional action neccessary. I got the idea because in last Friday's session, she accidentally both cast HM and used a bonus action attack in the same round. We caught it the next round (and took her BA for that round as a result) but really, it didn't seem like overkill and I realized after that applying the mark on an attack that hits could really help the action economy for the Ranger. I would still allow it to be applied as a bonus action if the Ranger doesn't want to do damage with it (for tracking purposes or the like) Any thoughts on if this is too good? [/QUOTE]

Verification