Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ranger 2024 is a bigger joke than Ranger 2014:
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mirrorrorrim" data-source="post: 9461825" data-attributes="member: 7040132"><p>I reeeally like how the 2024 design broadened character build concepts in all classes. There are way more viable and diverse builds even outside of Subclasses. So yeah, I understand how doubling down so hard on Hunter's Mark being the Ranger's THING feels more restrictive than all the other class designs.</p><p></p><p>Some people complain about the Ranger's Identity and that Hunter's Mark is not good for the identity. But if we're talking about the identity of the Ranger, what it is for 5E? The tagline for the ranger in the 2024 book is "A Wandering Warrior Imbued with Primal Magic." Is that accurate? For the most part yes, but when I look at the abilities of the Ranger, I can't help but focus on the Warrior aspect, and how they go about fulfilling that Warrior aspect. Because they aren't Druids.</p><p></p><p>As warriors, I see them as the Apex Predator class that cannot be stopped from hunting down and dealing with their chosen prey. They are the Polar Bears of the classes. No wild or urban terrain or distance discourages them, and when they find their quarry (whether a singular threat or a group), they have the tools to deal with them. From a game design standpoint, Hunter's Mark really works for a primal warrior class focused on tracking down and dealing with chosen enemies.</p><p></p><p>Because the Ranger fulfills my fantasy (Hunter's Mark and Precise Hunter and other related abilities also fulfill the "4E Seeker" theme I also enjoy), I'm not arguing as hard as others who see the Ranger as something different than a Primal Hunter Warrior. But I do get it that some people want something different. That was always going to happen. Some can't stand that the Ranger has magic at all. It's the most controversial of all classes when it comes to identity and expectation.</p><p></p><p>They had to pick a path, and not everyone was going to be happy. They picked a path that made it effective as the Unstoppable Predator (and I don't think it's bland). It succeeds at that role, and does not take away from other roles. But again, I do understand the desire to water down a solid, but mechanic-focused identity to broaden the possible "themes" of the base class. I think it is possible, because they did it with Warlock pacts too!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mirrorrorrim, post: 9461825, member: 7040132"] I reeeally like how the 2024 design broadened character build concepts in all classes. There are way more viable and diverse builds even outside of Subclasses. So yeah, I understand how doubling down so hard on Hunter's Mark being the Ranger's THING feels more restrictive than all the other class designs. Some people complain about the Ranger's Identity and that Hunter's Mark is not good for the identity. But if we're talking about the identity of the Ranger, what it is for 5E? The tagline for the ranger in the 2024 book is "A Wandering Warrior Imbued with Primal Magic." Is that accurate? For the most part yes, but when I look at the abilities of the Ranger, I can't help but focus on the Warrior aspect, and how they go about fulfilling that Warrior aspect. Because they aren't Druids. As warriors, I see them as the Apex Predator class that cannot be stopped from hunting down and dealing with their chosen prey. They are the Polar Bears of the classes. No wild or urban terrain or distance discourages them, and when they find their quarry (whether a singular threat or a group), they have the tools to deal with them. From a game design standpoint, Hunter's Mark really works for a primal warrior class focused on tracking down and dealing with chosen enemies. Because the Ranger fulfills my fantasy (Hunter's Mark and Precise Hunter and other related abilities also fulfill the "4E Seeker" theme I also enjoy), I'm not arguing as hard as others who see the Ranger as something different than a Primal Hunter Warrior. But I do get it that some people want something different. That was always going to happen. Some can't stand that the Ranger has magic at all. It's the most controversial of all classes when it comes to identity and expectation. They had to pick a path, and not everyone was going to be happy. They picked a path that made it effective as the Unstoppable Predator (and I don't think it's bland). It succeeds at that role, and does not take away from other roles. But again, I do understand the desire to water down a solid, but mechanic-focused identity to broaden the possible "themes" of the base class. I think it is possible, because they did it with Warlock pacts too! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ranger 2024 is a bigger joke than Ranger 2014:
Top