Canis said:And Barbarian societies were often VERY lawful.
just to argue one point -- not everyone in a barbarian society is going to have levels in the Barbarian class. in fact, probably very few would; only a select few chaotic raging berserk warriors. just because the Barbarian class can't be lawful doesn't say anything about the society these individuals come from.And, despite the obvious cultural flaws, Barbarians are Chaotic because they Rage?
i agree with the designers for the most part -- raging to me seems like a very chaotic activity, and not something a very lawful person would do.
i wouldn't call it "Rage" in that instance. i once built a prestige class for a group of holy warriors of a lawful neutral god that got a "rage"-like ability based on their religious zeal. i called it "fervor." it gave a slightly lower bonus to Con but a better bonus to Will saves. otherwise, it was identical with the Barbarian's rage ability mechanically, just different in flavor.So a Lawful Cleric or paladin couldn't go into a Holy Rage when witnessing an atrocity?
i do agree with you about wizards and lawfulness -- i've often contemplated a house rule where wizards have to be nonchaotic and sorcerers have to be nonlawful. just to give a bit more flavor difference between the two classes and accentuate their methods of magic.
Last edited: