Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dr. Strangemonkey" data-source="post: 2255244" data-attributes="member: 6533">Actually, I could have answered this much more simply, I'm sorry.  It's not that I'm saying you are prejudiced against DnD.  It's that I'm saying GnG may be nothing more than a prejuidice.  The former is an accusation of character, the latter is a quality or category of opinion.I'm certainly not implying, as I said above, that I think people who like GnG have not played DnD enough.The question of how well high level works might very well be highly germane to this thread.  I certainly think that it's interesting that you would distinguish between your opinion of the quality of the action in terms of wahoo and your opinion of the action in terms of its overall quality.It could be that GnG makes judgements based on unjust grounds.  I'm not certain about that yet, there are portions of the GnG based arguments I've seen that have made a lot of sense to me, and there are other portions that I've found highly questionable.  That's a lot of the reason I'd call it a prejuidice, but not because it has anything to do with injustice, just that the quality of the argument seems lacking.  Is that helpful?</blockquote>