NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ralts Bloodthorne" data-source="post: 2540558" data-attributes="member: 6390">I can agree with that. Beating someone down for a difference of opinion or beliefs is the refuge and action of the socially inept and the bully.See above.Actually, it coddles though who do not want to have repercussions.Your examples above only have physical acts of violence in common with my example. Your examples are quite difference from punching someone in the mouth for a verbal barrage that can't be repeated here without a threat of banning or an actual banning being leveled against me. If I was to subject you to the same language and same statements, you would immediately call out for my banning for breaking the rules of civility on this board.The ability to sue those who take them to task for thier mouths gave the vulgar, foul, rude and impolite the means to attack those gave them the punch in the mouth they richly deserved without any risks.It may be the law, but that don't make it right.LOL This is too funny.So it's OK to allow my family to be suggested to foul insuations, verbal rudeness of a vulgar and foul sort, because the laws are there to protect my family for people who would normally shoot the man for it?Your examples don't fit.The laws are to protect people who feel they have the right to say anything they want without repercussions. Who feel that a personal, verbal attack should be protected.Yeah, yours is the same. Quite the same.SO they were waiting politely for someone to park, to make sure they didn't need to back out and cause an accident, and to keep a decent clearance, and you decided that you were inconvienced enough by this politeness to repeatedly scream at them.Looks to me like the rudeness was on the other side.</blockquote>

Verification