Parmandur
Book-Friend, he/him
To be fair, that seems to be what they were doing before with the numbersIt's a stoplight. Red means no. Green means yes. Yellow means yes, but...
To be fair, that seems to be what they were doing before with the numbersIt's a stoplight. Red means no. Green means yes. Yellow means yes, but...
It was the idea, but the execution was much worse. No one at WotC can tell whether my vote of 2 was ‘I like the idea but the execution needs work’ or a ‘I do not like this’ (also keep in mind that there were more than 3 values). Red / yellow / green is better since it more clearly communicates what I want to happen as a result of my vote.To be fair, that seems to be what they were doing before with the numbers
* OMG! If my theory about the future Magic: the Gathering event "Reality Fracture" is true, then there may be some special surprise with Innistrad. We shouldn't rule out the possibility that they will later release something linked to Magic.
Lots of 3pp horror settings, but I'd have to guess that Ravenloft has way better mind-share than either of the other two, which I barely have heard of (classic example of internet fallacy "sample size: 1" but I'll own it)* Digital content released in D&DBeyond hasn't to appear in the Roadmap. And Ravenloft has got its own rivals with 3PP horror settings in DDB (Grimm Hollow and Crooked Moon).
I would still prefer it if they used clearly defined words rather than vague numbers, letters, or colors. Something simple like:It's a stoplight. Red means no. Green means yes. Yellow means yes, but...
I love these ideas!!! I love hexbloods, so seeing them get some love would make me happy!
The colors come with definitions, and I don't remember the wording. Red means "I don't like this, please rethink it". Green means "go ahead as is", yellow means "on the right track, but I have some reservations". Originally, red and green didn't allow commentary, but that got changed quickly.I would still prefer it if they used clearly defined words rather than vague numbers, letters, or colors. Something simple like:
- I love it. Don’t change a thing.
- I like it, but it needs a small tweak.
- I don’t really care either way. I just want to continue on to the next question.
- I don’t like it, but I can see how it can be salvaged.
- I hate it. Get out of here with that #^*+%
I confess I feel curiosity about the original Barovia in the material plane. This could be a great spin-off because this could enough space for supernatural factions like vampire clans, theriantropes tribes, spellcaster guilds, fae noble houses.. Of course it would be a lot of worldbuilding.
Other idea is a maid of pure heart who becomes the ultimate vampire-hunter, almost overpowered, but the plot-twist is she is the reincarnation of the angel Avacyn(Innistrad), or she isn't but the "heir of Avacyn's soulspark". Then her "hero travel" is not about to become more powerful but spiritually growing and learning to find the balance between mercy and justice.
* OMG! If my theory about the future Magic: the Gathering event "Reality Fracture" is true, then there may be some special surprise with Innistrad. We shouldn't rule out the possibility that they will later release something linked to Magic.
* The tsochart (3.5 Lords of Madness: Book of Aberrations) could be perfect for this 5.5e Ravenloft.
* Digital content released in D&DBeyond hasn't to appear in the Roadmap. And Ravenloft has got its own rivals with 3PP horror settings in DDB (Grimm Hollow and Crooked Moon).

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.