Target audience is not you.I swear you couldn't make this hypothetical product less appealing if you printed it on used toilet paper...
Honestly, I'm fine with that. Just don't talk about how Dragonlance is generic enough to just need the PHB and then go off on how stuff doesn't match Dragonlance lore.Sure, I would expect classic Dragonlance to change to fit the modern edition.
Honestly there is a lot of D&D products that aren't for me. I'm failing to see who this product is for at all. Classic fans have already played this. Setting fans are going to be dismayed and the lack of lore and options. New players aren't going to see the appeal of it beyond it being another adventure path, but one they don't get make their own PC in. DMs looking for adventures to pillage will find most of the modules need more work than normal to make generic due to setting constrictions. Players and DMs looking for new player options aren't getting anything. You are getting a hyper specific adventure path meant to be played with hyper specific characters in a hyper specific setting. Unless you are interested in playing that one specific thing, this book has minimal use.Target audience is not you.
I’ve long since learned that not everything is aimed at me.
How could you forget half-elves in Dragonlance? (yes, I count 2014 D&D, if that matters)I mean, classic Dragonlance only has four PHB species in it: human, elf, dwarf, and gnome. Every other PHB species is either replaced (halfling for kender), explicitly banned (orcs) or persona non grada (Planetouched, Dragonborn, Goliaths).
Not in the current PHB, which theoretically this book would be using.How could you forget half-elves in Dragonlance? (yes, I count 2014 D&D, if that matters)
I would expect to see the pregens in the art, and have character sheets online, similar to the existing pregens for this edition.I think it would be a seriously missed opportunity if they didn’t include the pregens. Absence of familiar characters was another reason the last DL effort failed.
Anyway, much point in plugging Rastalin if he isn’t in it!
Yes, but with classic Adventure maps redrawn for use with Maps on D&D Beyond.Lol. WHAT Dragonlance lore? You and @Parmandur have spent a half dozen pages arguing that Dragonlance can be run with PHB only. Now you want to get huffy about what does and doesn't fit in Krynn? Unless you're not going to expend resources to explain Krynn in detail (and more than a chapter if SotDQ is any example) then it's just gonna be a another kitchen sink setting of orc aberrant sorcerers, goliath world tree barbarians and aasimar celestial warlocks.
See that's the problem. I don't see WotC doing it. Not in the fashion being discussed. I don't think you could release the classic modules without some additional support for the setting and expect it to do well.Yes, but with classic Adventure maps redrawn for use with Maps on D&D Beyond.
I am not speculating on what I want, or think you will want, I am thinking about what WotC might actually do.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.