Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ravnica Available To DMs Guild Creators From Today!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Giltonio_Santos" data-source="post: 7766231" data-attributes="member: 36874"><p>While I'd agree that moving Greyhawk's characteristic IP to the Realms is a kind of mistreatment to a setting that many D&D players (including myself) enjoy, or even prefer, it doesn't represent a break of the pattern I commented on my previous post. Yes, it would be great if Wizards set Tyranny of Dragons on Krynn and Princes of the Apocalypse on Oerth, but that was not the case. In fact, TotYP made it clear that they're willing to make some additional effort to break modules away from classic settings they're not willing to support for now.</p><p></p><p>It's also a way to make sure that Guild efforts will be directed to products that support settings Wizards is working on. That's a fair business decision, IMO. If they decided to open Greyhawk for Guild support now, for example, creators would be tempted to compete against the Ravnica guide, instead of supporting it. I don't think that we, either as customers or creators, have the right to ask Wizards to use its IP in ways that risk damaging its business.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I prefer to see the glass half-full: once Wizards decides to actually release Greyhawk material (something I expect to happen in the future), Guild support will follow at full, and we'll see the setting get a real renaissance, instead of two or three good products trying to survive in a sea of Dark Sun, Dragonlance, Planescape, and Mystara glut, like would happen if they just allowed everything to get support at once.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Giltonio_Santos, post: 7766231, member: 36874"] While I'd agree that moving Greyhawk's characteristic IP to the Realms is a kind of mistreatment to a setting that many D&D players (including myself) enjoy, or even prefer, it doesn't represent a break of the pattern I commented on my previous post. Yes, it would be great if Wizards set Tyranny of Dragons on Krynn and Princes of the Apocalypse on Oerth, but that was not the case. In fact, TotYP made it clear that they're willing to make some additional effort to break modules away from classic settings they're not willing to support for now. It's also a way to make sure that Guild efforts will be directed to products that support settings Wizards is working on. That's a fair business decision, IMO. If they decided to open Greyhawk for Guild support now, for example, creators would be tempted to compete against the Ravnica guide, instead of supporting it. I don't think that we, either as customers or creators, have the right to ask Wizards to use its IP in ways that risk damaging its business. Personally, I prefer to see the glass half-full: once Wizards decides to actually release Greyhawk material (something I expect to happen in the future), Guild support will follow at full, and we'll see the setting get a real renaissance, instead of two or three good products trying to survive in a sea of Dark Sun, Dragonlance, Planescape, and Mystara glut, like would happen if they just allowed everything to get support at once. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ravnica Available To DMs Guild Creators From Today!
Top