Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ray Winninger mentions third project!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jaeger" data-source="post: 8302757" data-attributes="member: 27996"><p>I do not know what your hearing has to do with your reading ability, but you should get both checked by a qualified physician as my goal posts have no wheels.</p><p></p><p>I never made a "not invented here argument" that is you reading things in my post that aren't there.</p><p></p><p>Your "counter-argument", isn't. Because it refutes only what you imagined I wrote, not the actual text of my posts.</p><p></p><p>All your not-counterpoints were specific initiatives for more 5e <em>gaming material</em>.</p><p></p><p>Hickman and Weiss are writing <em>novels.</em></p><p></p><p>Apples and Oranges.</p><p></p><p>H&W getting a license from WOTC to do a new Dragonlance trilogy is a completely different situation to all the other examples you cited.</p><p></p><p>H&W are the ones paying WOTC for a license so that they can use the DL IP for their new novels.</p><p></p><p>The last Dragonlance novel they published was in 2011. The last DL setting book published for D&D was in 2008. DL is not a relevant or active IP in the current year.</p><p></p><p>Other posters on this thread have had no trouble understanding that, or the other points I have made. As can be readily seen from the reply's that you have received from them to your posts.</p><p></p><p>So if there is any misunderstanding here of what I am trying to say it is not because of me.</p><p></p><p>It is you.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Apology accepted.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is also a very good point.</p><p></p><p>What WOTC would want do with the DL setting may not jive with what Hickman and Weiss are keeping as cannon in their new books.</p><p></p><p>Given some of the things many of the not-Dragonlance fans had to say about the setting on the old lawsuit thread; it would not surprise me in the least that there might be a disconnect between the direction WOTC would like to go with the setting, and the setting elements Hickman and Weiss are keeping in the new trilogy.</p><p></p><p>I highly doubt Hickman and Weiss are going to retcon and invalidate their own body of work when they are looking to sell books to fans of the original trilogy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jaeger, post: 8302757, member: 27996"] I do not know what your hearing has to do with your reading ability, but you should get both checked by a qualified physician as my goal posts have no wheels. I never made a "not invented here argument" that is you reading things in my post that aren't there. Your "counter-argument", isn't. Because it refutes only what you imagined I wrote, not the actual text of my posts. All your not-counterpoints were specific initiatives for more 5e [I]gaming material[/I]. Hickman and Weiss are writing [I]novels.[/I] Apples and Oranges. H&W getting a license from WOTC to do a new Dragonlance trilogy is a completely different situation to all the other examples you cited. H&W are the ones paying WOTC for a license so that they can use the DL IP for their new novels. The last Dragonlance novel they published was in 2011. The last DL setting book published for D&D was in 2008. DL is not a relevant or active IP in the current year. Other posters on this thread have had no trouble understanding that, or the other points I have made. As can be readily seen from the reply's that you have received from them to your posts. So if there is any misunderstanding here of what I am trying to say it is not because of me. It is you. Apology accepted. This is also a very good point. What WOTC would want do with the DL setting may not jive with what Hickman and Weiss are keeping as cannon in their new books. Given some of the things many of the not-Dragonlance fans had to say about the setting on the old lawsuit thread; it would not surprise me in the least that there might be a disconnect between the direction WOTC would like to go with the setting, and the setting elements Hickman and Weiss are keeping in the new trilogy. I highly doubt Hickman and Weiss are going to retcon and invalidate their own body of work when they are looking to sell books to fans of the original trilogy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ray Winninger mentions third project!
Top