Cl1mh4224rd
First Post
Nail said:Here's th' thing: Magic is much more easily based on Aristotlian natural philosophy, rather than Modern Quantum Physics. In fact, Plato's forms are likely where some of th' concepts for illusions and glammers and such came from. Glammers affect the image of the object, but not the object itself. Pretty clear, really.
i agree.
I really don't care how you explain it...jus' as long as you don't draw some erroneous rule-assumptions from it. ("I'm blind 'cause I'm invisible!") But I'll betcha that if you used the reasoning of all those ancient dead Greek guys, you wouldn't have so much of a problem.
well, i'd say it's perfectly fine if you know that your conclusion is, by the rules, erroneous... that's what people like to call "house rules".
