Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jeff Wilder" data-source="post: 4090441" data-attributes="member: 5122">Because dissent is good.  Because although it's too late for 4E, maybe in 5E they'll take note of the fact that people prefer 1-2-1-2 over 1-1-1-1 by over 2-to-1, and that more people would even have rather had hexes than 1-1-1-1.  (For one example.)3E brought me back to the D&D.  Maybe 5E will bring me back to the current edition of D&D.  But they are less likely to fix what I think is wrong if I don't say what I think is wrong.So I've asked it before, and I'll ask it again: Why are some people so adamant against 4E critics?  What's the threat?  There are only two rules that I've seen in 4E that I dislike.  Why is it that when I say so, and explain why, instead of accepting that explanation at face value some people imply I'm too cheap to buy 4E, or a I'm 4E hater, or I'm hide bound, or I'm looking at 3E through rose-colored glasses?Why can't I simply be expressing concern over a brand that I've loved since I was 12 -- 28 years! -- in the hopes that some WotC designer, somewhere, will notice and keep it in mind?</blockquote>