Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 4092544" data-attributes="member: 2525">I had a response to the rest of your message, but I don't want it to distract from what just happened.  So lets limit it to this:OK, you know at this point that my position is that I am not calling everyone out at once and covering all people with a blanket sweeping generalization.  But right now I am calling YOU out for having done what you just did.  Why did you do that?  Why did you mischaracterize what I've been saying? I'd really like to know.  It's the third mischaraterization in this thread alone:1) Jeff Wilder mischaracterized my position as telling all 4e critics to shut up;2) Kamikaze Midget mischaracterized my position as applying to all 4e critics;3) You mischaracterized my position as calling "everyone" out and offering a blanket sweeping generalization, even though you knew it wasn't everyone, and it was a really narrow and specific claim that does in fact apply to an entire subgroup (it's the defining thing that makes it the subgroup).I have responded to the prior two and nobody had the guts to actually answer.  I am hoping you will give me an honest answer as to why you took what I said, changed it into something totally different, and spun it back as if that was what I was saying all along.</blockquote>