• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Reaping Mauler


log in or register to remove this ad

More like a knife to the jigglies. That's just being an :):):):):):):) on his part.

And I'd say do what's fun for everyone. If it's more fun to have him kill something single-handed, then do it.
 

I think it's open to debate. If the opponent is significantly more powerful, then make it a party victory in which the monk plays a key role. If the opponent is not that much more powerful than the monk, make it single combat.

Remember, just b/c it's larger doesn't mean it's a challenge for the monk.
 

It definitely NOT requires defeating an enemy single-handedly, since that's not what the requirement says. I wouldn't argue with a DM who house-ruled it, though - as long as the DM in question is aware it IS a house-rule :)
 

Jhaelen said:
It definitely NOT requires defeating an enemy single-handedly, since that's not what the requirement says. I wouldn't argue with a DM who house-ruled it, though - as long as the DM in question is aware it IS a house-rule :)

Agreed.

Prerequisites like this seem strange to me. If your DM is down with you taking the PrC, you're gonig to make the prereq without too much trouble. If your DM isn't down... well he should just say no and move on.
 





that doesn't sound that right...the party would de all the work and then the monk would just punch the lights out of the creature...I'd say if it's a very pwoerful creature, party win counts as long as the monk takes a significative role in the battle. Just a so-so creature? let him fight single-handed
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top