Recommendations for laptop PC under $600
not-so-newguy
I'm the Straw Man in your argument
Not sure what you mean by "solid state drive." Can you elaborate a little?
FrogReaver
As long as i get to be the frog
hard drive. Solid state is kind of like a large flash drive so it’s faster and less moving parts. Old school hard drives are cheaper so you get more memory for same price. They are noticeably slower though.
most new laptops have a solid state from what I’ve seen.
Last edited:
FrogReaver
As long as i get to be the frog
looks solid. I’m not sure the graphics card meets the requirement for the game you posted but as long as processor and ram does the game most likely will still run on low settings.
there’s sites that compare graphics cards. I know toms hardware used to do that a lot. You may can find something there To see how it stacks up to the listed ones in the requirements. I’d say you wont find a much better graphics card in a laptop though - not in that price range.
Ralif Redhammer
Legend
Sure! It's like a type of hard drive:
"While SSDs serve the same function as hard drives, their internal components are much different. Unlike hard drives, SSDs do not have any moving parts (which is why they are called solid state drives). Instead of storing data on magnetic platters, SSDs store data using flash memory. Since SSDs have no moving parts, they don't have to "spin up" while in a sleep state and they don't need to move a drive head to different parts of the drive to access data. Therefore, SSDs can access data faster than HDDs.
SSDs have several other advantages over hard drives as well. For example, the read performance of a hard drive declines when data gets fragmented, or split up into multiple locations on the disk. The read performance of an SSD does not diminish based on where data is stored on the drive. Therefore defragmenting an SSD is not necessary. Since SSDs do not store data magnetically, they are not susceptible to data loss due to strong magnetic fields in close proximity to the drive. Additionally, since SSDs have no moving parts, there is far less chance of a mechanical breakdown. SSDs are also lighter, quieter, and use less power than hard drives. This is why SSDs have become a popular choice for laptop computers."
"While SSDs serve the same function as hard drives, their internal components are much different. Unlike hard drives, SSDs do not have any moving parts (which is why they are called solid state drives). Instead of storing data on magnetic platters, SSDs store data using flash memory. Since SSDs have no moving parts, they don't have to "spin up" while in a sleep state and they don't need to move a drive head to different parts of the drive to access data. Therefore, SSDs can access data faster than HDDs.
SSDs have several other advantages over hard drives as well. For example, the read performance of a hard drive declines when data gets fragmented, or split up into multiple locations on the disk. The read performance of an SSD does not diminish based on where data is stored on the drive. Therefore defragmenting an SSD is not necessary. Since SSDs do not store data magnetically, they are not susceptible to data loss due to strong magnetic fields in close proximity to the drive. Additionally, since SSDs have no moving parts, there is far less chance of a mechanical breakdown. SSDs are also lighter, quieter, and use less power than hard drives. This is why SSDs have become a popular choice for laptop computers."
There's a bunch that will do a small SSD for your boot disk, and then a big-honking 1-2 Terabyte HDD for bulk storage.
FrogReaver
As long as i get to be the frog
notably I was looking on the 600 and below end about a year ago. most all the newer models I seen In the stores all had smaller SSD’s and nothing else. Like 128 GB was most common. Only the old models had any kind of HDD in them. Not saying none do - but that was my most recent experience.
miniaturepeddler
Explorer
Costco has an inexpensive laptop that had 1tb hd and 12gn ram. It is am Intel I3
You'll be okay for gaming, but not great.
Civ V on a very similar Intel CPU and GPU: UserBenchmark: Can I Run Sid Meier's Civilization V on a UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
For comparison, it's a tiny bit behind Civ 5 on a 6-year old GTX-750 with a desktop grade i3 CPU: UserBenchmark: Can I Run Sid Meier's Civilization V on a GTX 750-Ti
Realistically, that's probably pretty optimal for the price point you're aiming for. You might be able to get a little more bang for your buck with an AMD Ryzen processor, but I have to admit I'm a lot more familiar with Intel's options that AMD's.
As others have pointed out, the disk space on this machine is a little small but manageable. It will be fine for schoolwork, but that 126GB will go faster than you expect: Windows specs a minimum of 16GB, but is closer to 32GB in practice. You want to keep at least 16GB unused for optimal system performance. Civ 6 takes 12GB of space, minimum. That's almost half of the space allocated before you've done anything else. Take a look at the amount of storage used for photos, movies, and apps on your tablet/phone and see if you think you can get by. A portable hard drive is highly recommended.
not-so-newguy
I'm the Straw Man in your argument
These are the MINIMUM requirement for the game:
Graphics: 1 GB & AMD 5570 or nVidia 450 or Intel Integrated Graphics 530
2019 Levono
Graphics Coprocessor Intel UHD Graphics 620
So just for my own knowledge, the pertinent info here is "Intel UHD Graphics 620" and "Intel Integrated Graphics 530" ???
Do you remember the name?
Now I'm looking at Acer Aspire 5. First question off the top of my head, what's the difference between Windows 10 and Windows 10 Home? Is it the quality of security being provided?
Similar Threads
